Here at WWL, we love all of our commenters equally. However, as with children, we hold a special place in our hearts for some of you. One such person is a woman (we assume she is a woman) whom we have come to lovingly refer to as "Terry Figliuzzi-Mosley Lady," or TFML.First, a little background:
TFML first reared her head last November when we posted about Judge Mosley's mess with his son, Michael Mosley, after Michael was involved in a car crash that resulted in a death. TFML was adamant from the beginning that Michael's problems were Terry Mosley's fault (or as TFML refers to her: "Terry Figliuzzi-Mosely").
We thought TFML would simmer down after the Mosley post got knocked down a few rungs, but we underestimated her. Although the Mosley story was originally posted on November 19, 2008, TFML has continued to comment on it regularly. Her last comment was posted as recently as March 17, 2009.
Perhaps the most endearing thing about TFML is that she has not limited herself to commenting on the Mosley post, she has commented on some of our other posts as well, but her comments always deal with the same issue: her utter hatred of Terry Mosley.
According to TFML, Terry Mosley isn't a "Mosley" at all (although she is, apparently, Judge Mosley's baby mama). Terry had her name legally changed to Mosley, despite the fact that she never officially married the Judge.
At this point, you may be asking yourselves: "Who the *$%& cares?" Well, the reason we have shined the spotlight on our dear TFML is that she may have recently experienced an exciting triumph in her life. According to TFML, Terry Mosley has been arrested. From TFML's March 14th comment:
Good Job ~ Henderson Police Department.What's that? You would like a more concrete source than the ranting of an anonymous commenter?
Finally, law enforcement has picked up the infamous
Theresa (Terry) Figliuzzi Mosley....
Three arrest warrants were issued, and on Friday evening, March 13, 2009, Terry was handcuffed and booked into Henderson Detention, where she will appear in front of a Henderson Judge, Monday, March 16, 2009, in the afternoon ~ due to the hold that Clark County has on her, she will then be transported to Clark County Detention...
Who says Friday the 13th, is bad news!
Great Job ~ law enforcement! Remember she is an
xxxx girlfriend of a judge, NEVER THE WIFE of a judge....
UPDATE
The arrest of Terry Mosley has been confirmed. She was arrested for felony theft and writing multiple bad checks. TFML - we are sorry we ever doubted you sweetheart.
Is Terry "Mosley" Michael's mother?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.lvrj.com/blogs/smith/judges_foil_runs_foul_oflaw.html
ReplyDeleteor
http://www.fox5vegas.com/news/18968159/detail.htm/
I firmly believe, that more articles will be written, and the public will learn, more about Terry.
I hate to say it, but to be honest, I still don't care.
ReplyDeleteI'm an attorney in Vegas, but not a criminal defense attorney so I don't deal with Judge Mosley (though I agree with a LOT of his decisions on a few of the cases when I've observed a hearing that friends were participating in), but I haven't heard anything about TFM other than these postings. Clearly it's a seriously personal issue with TFML, and it sounds like it is rightfully so based on what TFML has said about TFM, presuming most of it is true...
I don't think it's necessary to go to a hearing to write about TFML as opposed to TFM.
The posting was about TFML's postings, not about TFM, so knowing the true story really doesn't change the fact that TFML is active on the boards and posting lots of good stuff about TFM.
Ex-girlfriend of judge charged with writing bad checks
ReplyDeleteBy Mary Manning
Thu, Mar 19, 2009 (1:45 p.m.)
METRO POLICE
Terry Mosley
The ex-girlfriend of District Court Judge Donald Mosley was arrested and booked into the Clark County Detention Center on two counts of writing bad checks, detention center records show.
The woman, 51-year-old Terry Mosley, also had two warrants out for her arrest on misdemeanor charges, said attorney Bernie Zadrowski of the DA's check fraud unit.
Mosley was arrested Tuesday for writing two bad checks of $200 each at Sunset Station Casino in Henderson, Zadrowski said. Those are misdemeanors.
She faced two felony charges for writing two checks worth $800 at a bar called Bounty Hunters, but pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor on Wednesday, Zadrowski said. Anything above $250 is considered a felony, he said.
She is still facing two misdemeanor counts for writing two bad checks for $100 each at the Texas Station in North Las Vegas, he said.
KLAS-TV: Judge Mosley Ex-Girlfriend in Jail
ReplyDeleteBad Checks Lands Judge's Former Girlfriend in Jail
KLAS-TV, 3/19
Terry Mosley, the ex-girlfriend of District Court Judge Donald Mosley, has been arrested and charged with writing bad checks.
When I first read this headline, I felt certain it referred to Amy McNair, (former?) girlfriend of Family Court Judge Steven Jones. Turns out it refers to the "ex" of criminal court judge Donald Mosley.
Apparently the only thing Judge Mosley and his ex-girlfriend Terry have in common is their son, who came to juvenile court a few months ago on a serious charge. I happened to be in Courtroom 18 at the time, and saw the ex-couple in action. Terry is a true nutcase whose sole goal in life seems to be making Judge Mosley's life hell. The kid is stuck in the middle.
I'm not sure the "ex-girlfriend" ended up with the last name "Mosley," but it's apparently a very convoluted 20-year saga, driven by the girlfriend's insanity.
POSTED BY GLENN CAMPBELL AT 11:59 PM
LABELS: JUVENILE JUSTICE
Terry,
ReplyDeleteThe OBSESSION IS YOURS....You can't find a life, without Don, and being the mother of a child, doesn't give you ANY CREDIBILITY....The sickness that YOU HAVE, is called Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, which started, when Don Mosley said, he wanted NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU ~ you verbally said:" that you would do everything to ruin him"....Do you remember that statement?
The sad thing is: YOU LIKE TO RUIN EVERYBODY, WHO HAS EVER TRIED TO HELP YOU...You verbally threaten people, including your son, your parents, your former friends, attorney's, and judges...Your life is a joke and your abuse of the last name Mosley is a sin.
Miss Crabb, feels "SYMPATHY" for you, and wishes that you will eventually seek "professional" help or go to your church to ask: "Forgiveness". You are Catholic?
Hold on to your hats! The story about Terry Figliuzzi Mosley is about to get bigger. If you want to know things regarding legal antics, there is one about to become bigger than you anticipated.
ReplyDeleteTerry Figliuzzi aka Terry Mosley has had her name changed numerous times:
ReplyDelete1) Terry Figliuzzi to Terry Fields
2) Terry Figliuzzi-Fields to Terry Mosley
NAME CHANGE:
CASE: 94-D-180961
Petition for name change on 10/07/1994.....Theresa M. Figiliuzzi
GRANTED by Judge Steven E. Jones
to Theresa M. Mosley on 1/26/1995
There was NEVER A MARRIAGE, between Judge Don Mosley to Terry Figliuzzi!
Terry Figliuzzi, will represent herself as:
a) the wife of Judge Mosley
b) separated from Judge Mosley
c) divorced from Judge Mosley
I hope that this information, will stay posted:
ReplyDeleteCRH000215-0000 STATE OF NEVADA VS MOSLEY, TERRY M
File Date 02/24/2009 Case Status WARRANT Case Status Date 02/24/2009
Case Disposition UNDISPOSED Case Disposition Date
Party Information
Party Name Party Alias(es) Party Type Attorney(s) Attorney Phone
MOSLEY, TERRY M
DEFENDANT CR/TR
Party Charge(s)
Case Party MOSLEY, TERRY M
Count Code Description Disposition Disposition
Date
1 2227 NON SUFFICIENT FUNDS/CHECKS
Docket Entries
Date Text
04/21/2009 ALERT INFORMATION BENCH WARRANT - CRIMINAL issued on: 04/21/2009 For: MOSLEY, TERRY MARIE Bond Amt:$350.00 CASH ONLY
04/21/2009 FORM GENERATED CRIMINAL BENCH WARRANT Sent on: 05/05/2009 09:34:08
04/21/2009 D. S. GIBSON SR, JP S. MORGAN, DDA B. STEELE, CLK L. BRENSKE, CR
04/21/2009 STATUS CHECK: Defendant NOT PRESENT. Motion by State to Issue BENCH WARRANT. Motion GRANTED.
04/21/2009 CRIMINAL BENCH WARRANT FTA The following event: STATUS CHECK HND scheduled for 04/21/2009 at 9:00 am has been resulted as follows: Result: CRIMINAL BENCH WARRANT FTA Judge: Location:
03/19/2009 SET FOR COURT APPEARANCE Event: STATUS CHECK HND Date: 04/21/2009 Time: 9:00 am Judge: GIBSON SR, DAVID S Location: DEPARTMENT 3
03/19/2009 HEARING HELD The following event: COURT APPEARANCE HND scheduled for 03/19/2009 at 9:00 am has been resulted as follows: Result: CRIMINAL HEARING HELD Judge: TOBIASSON, MELANIE Location: DEPARTMENT 3
03/19/2009 INITIAL ARRAIGNMENT: DEFENDANT PRESENT IN CUSTODY Defendant ADVISED, WAIVED reading of Complaint Defendant ADVISED of right to secure own Counsel PER NEGOTIATIONS: COMPLAINT SUBMITTED TO "DRAWING AND PASSING A CHECK WITHOUT SUFFICIENT FUNDS IN DRAWEE BANK WITH INTENT TO DEFRAUD, PRESUMPTIONS OF INTENT TO DEFRAUD" TO PAY $350 RESTITUTION TO STAY OUT OF TROUBLE FOR PENDENCY OF CASE THEN TO BE DISMISSED O.R. RELEASE
03/19/2009 M. TOBIASSON, JP FOR D. S. GIBSON SR, JP B. KOCHEVAR, DDA B. STEELE, CLK L. BRENSKE, CR
03/17/2009 SET FOR COURT APPEARANCE Event: COURT APPEARANCE HND Date: 03/19/2009 Time: 9:00 am Judge: GIBSON SR, DAVID S Location: DEPARTMENT 3 Result: CRIMINAL HEARING HELD
03/16/2009 ALERT INFORMATION ARREST WARRANT - CRIMINAL served on: 03/16/2009 For: MOSLEY, TERRY MARIE
02/24/2009 ALERT INFORMATION ARREST WARRANT - CRIMINAL issued on: 02/24/2009 For: MOSLEY, TERRY MARIE Bond Amt:$350 CASH OR $3500 SURETY BOND
02/24/2009 Complaint FILED. Upon Motion by State, Arrest Warrant ISSUED. BAIL SET. ARREST WARRANT - CRIMINAL created on: 02/24/2009 For: MOSLEY, TERRY MARIE
11/26/2008 BAIL AMOUNT Charge #3: NON SUFFICIENT FUNDS/CHECKS
11/26/2008 BAIL AMOUNT Charge #1: NON SUFFICIENT FUNDS/CHECKS
11/26/2008 BAIL AMOUNT Charge #1: NON SUFFICIENT FUNDS/CHECKS
Terry Figliuzzi ~ who changed her last name to MOSLEY ~ HAS "ANOTHER"
WARRANT...
Prevention, caution, and less enabling of Terry Figliuzzi Mosley's behavior, will SAVE potential victim's from what she has done to others...Judge Mosley didn't CREATE the web of deceit...Terry Figliuzzi Mosley CREATED her own web.
District Court Judge Mosley never Bid on a baseball at the charity event. Anybody that knows the Judge knows he is a sportsman and outdoorman NOT a sports fan. I am sick and tired of hearing about all these false facts being made by Dana Gentry. Miss Crabb as been a VICTIM of all these lies and false truths. Miss Gentry the real facts will come out and all your questions and false alligations will be answered. Even before the election Miss Gentry was after the Judge with all her false truths. However, the public saw through all the B.S and he was re-elected. Get off Miss Crabb she is one of the most honest, sincere people I know. An upstanding person of our community and known as the sweetheart of Las Vegas. If you want to get your facts straight, Terry Mosley is the one you need to be writing about. She is a cheat and a scammer. You will hear more and will read more about her very soon and the many laws she has broken. Miss Crabb won her case in a court of law regarding her home and will verify everything the press has accused her of. Get off the Judge and Miss Crabb. Another thing where do you think all the lies come from none other than Terry Mosley a woman scorned and using the Mosley name for her own benefit.
ReplyDeleteOne can "only" assume, that Terry Figliuzzi Mosley's
ReplyDeletewinnings from the slot machines at Railroad Pass Casino, has given her enough funds to retain the attorney Urlich W. Smith, to make the motion to quash her bench warrant. Hearing is set for 9:00 am, May 28, 2009, in front of Judge Gibson Sr.
09CRH000215-0000 STATE OF NEVADA VS MOSLEY, TERRY M
File Date 02/24/2009 Case Status WARRANT Case Status Date 02/24/2009
Case Disposition UNDISPOSED Case Disposition Date
Party Information
Party Name Party Alias(es) Party Type Attorney(s) Attorney Phone
MOSLEY, TERRY M
DEFENDANT CR/TR
Case Schedule
Date Start Time Event Type Result
05/28/2009 09:00 AM MOTIONS HND
Party Charge(s)
Case Party MOSLEY, TERRY M
Count Code Description Disposition Disposition
Date
1 2227 NON SUFFICIENT FUNDS/CHECKS
Docket Entries
Date Text
05/26/2009 MOTION TO QUASH BENCH WARRANT FILED BY ULRICH W. SMITH, ESQ. RECIEPT OF COPY FILED
05/26/2009 SET FOR COURT APPEARANCE Event: MOTIONS HND Date: 05/28/2009 Time: 9:00 am Judge: GIBSON SR, DAVID S Location: DEPARTMENT 3
04/21/2009 ALERT INFORMATION BENCH WARRANT - CRIMINAL issued on: 04/21/2009 For: MOSLEY, TERRY MARIE Bond Amt: $350.00 CASH ONLY
04/21/2009 FORM GENERATED CRIMINAL BENCH WARRANT Sent on: 05/05/2009 09:34:08
04/21/2009 D. S. GIBSON SR, JP S. MORGAN, DDA B. STEELE, CLK L. BRENSKE, CR
04/21/2009 STATUS CHECK: Defendant NOT PRESENT. Motion by State to Issue BENCH WARRANT. Motion GRANTED.
04/21/2009 CRIMINAL BENCH WARRANT FTA The following event: STATUS CHECK HND scheduled for 04/21/2009 at 9:00 am has been resulted as follows: Result: CRIMINAL BENCH WARRANT FTA Judge: Location:
03/19/2009 SET FOR COURT APPEARANCE Event: STATUS CHECK HND Date: 04/21/2009 Time: 9:00 am Judge: GIBSON SR, DAVID S Location: DEPARTMENT 3
03/19/2009 HEARING HELD The following event: COURT APPEARANCE HND scheduled for 03/19/2009 at 9:00 am has been resulted as follows: Result: CRIMINAL HEARING HELD Judge: TOBIASSON, MELANIE Location: DEPARTMENT 3
03/19/2009 INITIAL ARRAIGNMENT: DEFENDANT PRESENT IN CUSTODY Defendant ADVISED, WAIVED reading of Complaint Defendant ADVISED of right to secure own Counsel PER NEGOTIATIONS: COMPLAINT SUBMITTED TO "DRAWING AND PASSING A CHECK WITHOUT SUFFICIENT FUNDS IN DRAWEE BANK WITH INTENT TO DEFRAUD, PRESUMPTIONS OF INTENT TO DEFRAUD" TO PAY $350 RESTITUTION TO STAY OUT OF TROUBLE FOR PENDENCY OF CASE THEN TO BE DISMISSED O.R. RELEASE
03/19/2009 M. TOBIASSON, JP FOR D. S. GIBSON SR, JP B. KOCHEVAR, DDA B. STEELE, CLK L. BRENSKE, CR
03/17/2009 SET FOR COURT APPEARANCE Event: COURT APPEARANCE HND Date: 03/19/2009 Time: 9:00 am Judge: GIBSON SR, DAVID S Location: DEPARTMENT 3 Result: CRIMINAL HEARING HELD
03/16/2009 ALERT INFORMATION ARREST WARRANT - CRIMINAL served on: 03/16/2009 For: MOSLEY, TERRY MARIE
02/24/2009 ALERT INFORMATION ARREST WARRANT - CRIMINAL issued on: 02/24/2009 For: MOSLEY, TERRY MARIE Bond Amt: $350 CASH OR $3500 SURETY BOND
02/24/2009 Complaint FILED. Upon Motion by State, Arrest Warrant ISSUED. BAIL SET. ARREST WARRANT - CRIMINAL created on: 02/24/2009 For: MOSLEY, TERRY MARIE
11/26/2008 BAIL AMOUNT Charge #3: NON SUFFICIENT FUNDS/CHECKS
11/26/2008 BAIL AMOUNT Charge #1: NON SUFFICIENT FUNDS/CHECKS
11/26/2008 BAIL AMOUNT Charge #1: NON SUFFICIENT FUNDS/CHECKS
State Bar of Nevada ~ WWW.NVBAR.ORG
ReplyDeletePART: ONE (1)
JAMES E. GUESMAN Case Nos. 99-100-0291; 00-049-0291; 00-055-0291; 00-057-0291; 01-045-0291 Filed May 30, 2001 The following public reprimand was issued by the State Bar of Nevada pursuant to a Conditional Guilty Plea. See SCR 113(1), (5). To: JAMES E. GUESMAN This Public Reprimand is the culmination of five (5) grievances lodged against you for professional misconduct. Much of the professional misconduct may be attributable to a lack of adequate supervision on your part of your nonlawyer staff. A summary of those grievances is as follows: (1) In August of 1996, you were retained by BettyJane Sheldon (hereafter “Sheldon”) to represent her in her divorce. Upon retention, Sheldon remitted payment to your paralegal. For the next five months, Sheldon did not receive return telephone calls from your office and did not receive a copy of her divorce decree. Sometime thereafter, Sheldon was advised that you no longer employed your paralegal. Sheldon was further advised that the firm hired a new paralegal who would be assisting you and would follow up with Sheldon. Sheldon remained patient for the several months thereafter, but heard nothing from your office. She resumed calling your office and eventually reached you in May of 1999. Thereafter, you failed to maintain adequate communication with Sheldon. In attempting to determine the status of her case, Sheldon contacted the Family Court Clerk’s Office and was advised that a complaint for divorce was never filed. Consequently, Sheldon reported you to the State Bar. In attempting to investigate Sheldon’s allegations, the State Bar sent numerous letters to you. However, you failed to respond. In light of the foregoing, the designated panel found violated SCR 154 (Communication), SCR 187 (Responsibility regarding nonlawyer assistants) and SCR 200(2) (Bar association and disciplinary matters: failure to respond to a lawful request for information from a disciplinary authority). (2) In March of 1998, Leslie Povelko (hereafter “Povelko”) retained you assist her with child support and visitation matters concerning her daughter. Shortly after you were retained, Povelko began experiencing problems with your office. Specifically, Povelko was not notified of the case status by your secretary. Consequently, Povelko reported you to the State Bar. In attempting to investigate Povelko’s allegations, the State Bar sent numerous letters to you eliciting information. Though you requested and were granted extensions of time to provide a response, you failed to respond. In light of the foregoing, the designated panel found that you violated SCR 154 (Communication), SCR 187 (Responsibility regarding nonlawyer assistants) and SCR 200(2) (Bar association and disciplinary matters: failure to respond to a lawful request for information from a disciplinary authority). (3) In 1994, Kathleen Haney (hereafter “Haney”) retained you to represent her in an auto
PART: TWO (2) next post
PART: TWO (2)
ReplyDeleteaccident case. In July of 1997, Haney filed a grievance against you with the State Bar complaining that you performed little or no legal services on her behalf and failed to maintain adequate communication with her. In a September 4, 1997, letter, you advised the State Bar that you timely filed a civil complaint on Haney’s behalf to “preserve the Statute Deadline.” Based on your representations in your September 1997 letter, the matter was closed. In January 1998, you notified the State Bar via telephone that your prior letter was inaccurate because, though you timely filed suit, you did not effectuate service upon the defendant within the 120 day time frame set forth in the NRCP. Consequently, the suit was time barred because you could no longer re-file it during the applicable limitations period. In light of the foregoing, the designated hearing panel found that you violated SCR 151 (Competence), SCR 153 (Diligence), SCR 154 (Communication) and SCR 187 (Responsibility regarding nonlawyer assistants).(4) Patrick Baumgartner (hereafter “Baumgartner”) retained you to represent him in his divorce. At the time, Baumgartner was stationed in Egypt but was home on emergency leave. He also retained you to draft and file the necessary documentation to secure an extension in Baumgartner’s emergency leave so that he would be present for his divorce proceedings. You drafted a complaint for divorce and had it verified by Baumgartner on or about June 24, 1998. You failed to file and serve Baumgartner’s complaint for divorce. Consequently, Baumgartner had to retain new counsel as of August 14, 1998. Your failure to file Baumgartner’s complaint for divorce is, at least in part, due to your failure to adequately supervise your nonlawyer staff. Ultimately, you refunded Baumgartner’s retainer in full. In light of the foregoing, the designated hearing panel found that you violated SCR 151 (Competence), 153 (Diligence), SCR 154 (Communication) and SCR 187 (Responsibility regarding nonlawyer assistants). (5) You were counsel of record for Michael Leonetti in his guilty plea resulting in a criminal conviction (Leonetti v. State, no. 36980). During the course of an appeal, which was unknown to you at the time, you failed to respond to any of the notices and orders sent to you by the Supreme Court of Nevada. All written communication to you was returned to the Court. On March 26, 2001, the Supreme Court entered an order, which was served on you, remanding the case to District Court to secure new appellate counsel. In light of the foregoing, the designated hearing panel found that you violated SCR 79 (Address of member) and SCR 173(3) (Knowingly disobeying an obligation under the rules of a tribunal). Pursuant to the terms of your conditional guilty plea agreement, you are also hereby placed on probation for a period of two (2) years, with conditions as set forth in the Conditional Guilty Plea.
Ms. Crabb was wanting Mr. James E. Guesman, to seek proper professionals before she filed a COMPLAINT WITH THE BAR ASSOCIATION.
Regarding the article(s) that were posted by Terry Figliuzzi Mosley, with the assistance of her "reporter" FRIEND.
ReplyDeleteSeek the "TRUTH", and then report it!.........
PREAMBLE:
Members of the Society of Professional Journalists believe that public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues. Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist's credibility. Members of the Society share a dedication to ethical behavior and adopt this code to declare the Society's principles and standards of practice.
"Rumors" at this time:
ReplyDeleteQuash for bench warrant on Terry Figliuzzi Mosley ~
DENIED.
Will confirm with public records later.
Yep! Bench Warrant on Terry Figliuzzi Mosley ~
ReplyDelete"D E N I E D"
09CRH000215-0000 STATE OF NEVADA VS MOSLEY, TERRY M
File Date 02/24/2009 Case Status WARRANT Case Status Date 02/24/2009
Case Disposition UNDISPOSED Case Disposition Date
Party Information
Party Name Party Alias(es) Party Type Attorney(s) Attorney Phone
MOSLEY, TERRY M
DEFENDANT CR/TR
SMITH, ULRICH WALTER
Case Schedule
Date Start Time Event Type Result
06/03/2009 09:00 AM STATUS CHECK HND
Party Charge(s)
Case Party MOSLEY, TERRY M
Count Code Description Disposition Disposition
Date
1 2227 NON SUFFICIENT FUNDS/CHECKS
Docket Entries
Date Text
05/28/2009 SET FOR COURT APPEARANCE Event: STATUS CHECK HND Date: 06/03/2009 Time: 9:00 am Judge: GIBSON SR, DAVID S Location: DEPARTMENT 3
05/28/2009 HEARING HELD The following event: MOTIONS HND scheduled for 05/28/2009 at 9:00 am has been resulted as follows: Result: CRIMINAL HEARING HELD Judge: GIBSON SR, DAVID S Location: DEPARTMENT 3
05/28/2009 MOTION: DEFENDANT NOT PRESENT MOTION TO RECALL BENCH WARRANT. MOTION DENIED. DEFENDANT TO BE PRESENT BENCH WARRANT STANDS
Once again, the "mother" of Judge Mosley's son, still has a bench warrant out for her regarding the writing of "hot checks"....Terry Figliuzzi Mosley's attorney Ulrich W. Smith, withdrew as counsel...It appears that Terry Figliuzzi Mosley, has more issues with the law, coming down the path of right or wrong.
ReplyDelete09CRH000215-0000 STATE OF NEVADA VS MOSLEY, TERRY M
File Date 02/24/2009 Case Status WARRANT Case Status Date 02/24/2009
Case Disposition UNDISPOSED Case Disposition Date
Party Information
Party Name Party Alias(es) Party Type Attorney(s) Attorney Phone
MOSLEY, TERRY M
DEFENDANT CR/TR
Party Charge(s)
Case Party MOSLEY, TERRY M
Count Code Description Disposition Disposition
Date
1 2227 NON SUFFICIENT FUNDS/CHECKS
Docket Entries
Date Text
06/03/2009 HEARING HELD The following event: STATUS CHECK HND scheduled for 06/03/2009 at 9:00 am has been resulted as follows: Result: CRIMINAL HEARING HELD Judge: GIBSON SR, DAVID S Location: DEPARTMENT 3
06/03/2009 STATUS CHECK: DEFENDANT NOT PRESENT MOTION BY DEFENSE TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL. MOTION GRANTED. DEFENSE TO INSTRUCT DEFENDANT TO STOP CALLING COURTHOUSE. BENCH WARRANT STANDS
06/03/2009 D. S. GIBSON SR, JP D. WESTMEYER, DDA U. SMITH, ESQ. B. STEELE, CLK L. BRENSKE, CR appear in court as the DEFENDANT,
Question: Since Terry Figliuzzi Mosley has been "EVICTED" from the home in Anthem Country Club, and is no longer living at the Railroad Pass Casino, or residing at the McCormick's home ~ WHO IS NOW AIDING AND ABETTING this "fugitive" on the run?
FUGITIVE definition:
adj 1 :one who fless or tries to esacpe 2 :somthing elusive or hard to find
FUGITIVE adj 1 : running away or trying to escape 2 :likely to vanish suddenly : not fixed or lasting
Second question: Terry Figliuzzi Mosley, are you a fugitive? (yes or no)
Call the D.A.'s office to confirm what is written!
Why was the mother (Terry Figliuzzi Mosley) living with McLaughlin, who was known to be a felon?
ReplyDeleteWhy did he testify for the Judge, in the first place? What did McLaughlin have on T.F.M.?
The letters were addressed to the principals of Michael's school, Diane Reitz and Frank Cooper. Reitz testified that it was part of the school's procedure to have a letter along with a custody order placed in the student's file. Reitz and Cooper testified that they were not influenced by the fact that Judge Mosley was a district court judge and that they knew, before receiving the letters, that he was a judge.
UPDATE: Theft (FELONY)
ReplyDelete"Henderson Township Courts"..........
-0000 STATE OF NEVADA VS MOSLEY, THERESA M
File Date 06/08/2009 Case Status OPEN Case Status Date 06/08/2009
Case Disposition UNDISPOSED Case Disposition Date
Party Information
Party Name Party Alias(es) Party Type Attorney(s) Attorney Phone
MOSLEY, THERESA M
MOSLEY, TERRT M
DEFENDANT CR/TR
Party Charge(s)
Case Party MOSLEY, THERESA M
Count Code Description Disposition Disposition
Date
1 5578 THEFT (FELONY)
Docket Entries
Date Text
06/08/2009 PENDING JUDGE'S SIGNATURE
05/15/2009 BAIL AMOUNT Charge #1: THEFT (FELONY)
09CRH000987-0000 STATE OF NEVADA VS MOSLEY, THERESA M
ReplyDeleteThe "complete" case number, for the latest COMPLAINT, filed on Terry Figliuzzi Mosley.
No Angel wrote:
ReplyDeleteCheck out ~ Dana M. Gentry
Date of Birth: November/1959
Can't write an ACCURATE story and can't BALANCE the check book!
Henderson Township Courts:
http://cvpublicaccess.co.clark.nv.us/pa/
CASE NUMBERS:
1) 01CH000336
2) 03CRH000357-0000
3) 03CRH000387-0000
4) 03PCH000347-0000
5) 03PCH000433-0000
6) 07CRH002579-0000
7) 07PCH002504-0000
Isn't writing "hot" checks a FELONY? Appears to be a "history" of insufficient funds for this irresponsible journalist, called Dana Gentry!
Gee, I would think, that this type of behavior isn't fitting for a journalist, who expects certain standards from other individuals and asks questions of officials, yet they themselves can't uphold their own standards.
Looks like Dana Gentry, likes holding herself ABOVE THE LAW!
Check out Dana Gentry's other legal issues in Clark County, go to the
clark county website.
Dana Resnick-Gentry who does she think she is?
How can she asks any questions, when she herself has many questions that need to be asked of her, about HER OWN CONDUCT.
No wonder, she and Terry Figliuzzi-Fields-Mosley, get along so well....
they're two peas in a pod.
Investigate these two women:
1) Dana Resnick-Gentry
2) Terry Figliuzzi-Fields-Mosley
Day "BEFORE", the arrest of Terry Mosley (March 13, 2009) Dana Resnick Gentry, eventually PAID her bad check "AFTER" year and half, then sends HER ATTORNEY FRIEND, to pay Terry Mosley's bad checks?????
http://red.state.nv.us/publications/newslette...
ReplyDeleteTheresa Mosley
License No. 21506
Salesperson
Action: Mosley prepared a lease
option agreement and was paid
$16,700 for “services rendered.”
She accepted the payment directly
from her clients and did not disclose
the transaction or payment to her
broker. She did not provide her
clients with the appropriate trans-
action forms and did not keep a file
of the transaction at her broker’s
office. The transaction and payment
remained undiscovered until
Mosley’s clients filed a complaint
with the Division approximately 2 ½
years later.
http://red.state.nv.us/realestate/minutes/200...
ReplyDeleteNRED v. Mosley, Theresa (9:05 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.)
Case No. S03-06-08-280
License No. 21506 S
Ms. Mosley was present and was not represented by counsel. She explained that she had counsel, but they
had withdrawn when she could not get a continuance for this meeting.
Gina Session was present on behalf of the Division.
Discussion ensued with Ms. DeVries regarding whether or not Ms. Mosley’s broker had been notified of
this hearing pursuant to NAC 645.855. Ms. DeVries explained that since Ms. Mosley had changed brokers
during the time that this case was being noticed the notification had gone to her previous broker and not her
current broker.
Ms. Session made a motion to amend the complaint to add some factual allegations to support the sixth
claim for relief. She added Ms. Mosley failed to include a termination date in the November 27, 2000
agreement. She further explained that Ms. Mosley has had notice of these allegations through other
correspondence from the Division.
10
Ms. Mosley stated that she does not have the file in this case, her attorney has the file and she was not able
to get the file back from him after the continuance was not granted. She requested that she needs more time
to prepare her case so that she can get the file back and get a new attorney to represent her in this matter.
Ms. Session explained that the complaint was served on Ms. Mosley in April and she has had two months
to retain an attorney that could be present to represent her. Her attorney was given one continuance and
when that continuance was granted the attorney was given notice of this meeting and should have requested
another continuance at that time rather than waiting to the last minute. Their second continuance was
denied unless Ms. Mosley was willing to voluntarily surrender her license and have the case heard in July
in Carson City, but Ms. Mosley chose not to accept that option.
Commissioner Gurr explained the process that was followed when the continuance requests were received
and considered by her and the rationale behind her decision on each of them.
Commissioner Rossum suggested that since Respondent does not have her file with her and the
Commission does not want to continue this case, she should be allowed to go to her attorney’s office to
pick up the file and return later in this meeting so that the case may be heard.
Ms. Mosley stated that she does not need the file as much as she needed to subpoena certain witnesses.
Commissioner Jameson moved to deny the continuance request. Commissioner Rossum seconded.
Unanimous decision.
Ms. Mosley apologized to the Commission, Division and Attorney General for the inconvenience she has
caused. She asked that she be allowed to put her license on ice until the next meeting that she could attend.
Commissioner Gurr stated that she had recommended that her license be placed on ice until the October
meeting or the July if she prefers.
Ms. Mosley stated that she prefers waiting until the October meeting due to the expense of getting
witnesses up to Carson City.
Ms. Session stated that as long as she surrendered her license the State would not oppose a continuance in
this matter.
Commissioner Gurr moved to approve the request for a continuance to the next regularly scheduled
meeting of the Commission in the South provided the Respondent surrender her license to the Division not
later than 5pm Wed, June 15, 2005. Commissioner Green seconded. Discussion ensued. Commissioner
Jameson moved to amend the motion so that the license is surrendered by 5pm today.
For continuation of minutes go to link:
http://red.nv.us/reaslestate/minutes/2005/REC...
NOTICE & AGENDA OF PUBLIC MEETING
ReplyDeleteOF THE
NEVADA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION
OCTOBER 24-26, 2005
The Nevada Real Estate Commission will conduct a meeting on MONDAY,
OCTOBER 24, 2005, BEGINNING AT 8:30 A.M., and each day thereafter
beginning at 8:30 A.M. , through WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 26, 2005, or until
such time as all business has been concluded, at the following location:
MON.-TUES., OCT. 24-25, 2005 WED., OCTOBER 26, 2005
SAWYER BUILDING SAWYER BUILDING
555 E. WASHINGTON AVENUE 555 E. WASHINGTON AVENUE
ROOM 4412 ROOM 4500
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89101 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89101
STACKED AGENDA: Below is an agenda of all items scheduled to be considered. Unless otherwise
stated, items may be taken out of the order presented on the agenda by the discretion of the Chairperson.
Persons who have business before the Commission are solely responsible to see that they are present when
their business is conducted. Public Comment may be limited to ten minutes per person at the discretion of
the Chairperson.
NOTICE: Reasonable efforts will be made to assist and accommodate physically handicapped persons
desiring to attend the meeting. Please call Joanne Gierer at (702) 486-4480 ext. 259, prior to the meeting
so arrangements may be conveniently made.
* Denotes potential action item
1 * 10/24/05 @
8:30 A.M. Commission/Division Business INTRODUCTION OF COMMISSIONERS IN ATTENDANCE
INTRODUCTION OF DIVISION STAFF IN ATTENDANCE
Administrator
Governor
SYDNEY H. WICKLIFFE,
C.P.A.
Director
DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND
INDUSTRY
REAL ESTATE DIVISION
2501 E. Sahara Avenue, Suite 102
Las Vegas, Nevada 89104
(702) 486-4480 ext. 259 • Fax (702) 486-4067
E-mail: jegierer@red.state.nv.us
www.red.state.nv.us
1
2
2 *
LICENSE DENIAL
APPEAL:
1. Hoffman, Edward
File No. S-LDA-06-004
2. McCullough, Travis
File No. S-LDA-06-008
3* DISCIPLINARY ACTION: 1. NRED v. Valeriano, Luigi F.
Case No. S04-06-33-337
License No. 51189 S
2. NRED v. Sweet, Larry
Case No. S04-01-33-185 & S04-10-07-105
License No. 11809
3. NRED v. Belding, Kuulei M.
Case No. S05-08-31-071
License No. unlicensed
4. NRED v. Frasure, James
Case No. S06-07-01-01
License No. unlicensed
5. NRED v. Knobloch, Richard
Case No. S06-07-02-02
License No. 48519
6. NRED v. Saleres, Tommy “Sal”
Case No. S05-12-37-219
License No. 53824
7. NRED v. Ruybalid, Victor E.
Case No. S06-07-22-022
License No. 31441
8. NRED v. Kelley, Kolleen
Case No. S06-07-21-021
License No. 27858
9. NRED v. Mosley, Theresa M.
Case No. S03-06-08-280
License No. 21506 S
NV Real Estate Division
788 Fairview Drive, Suite 200
Carson City, NV 89701-5453
NV Real Estate Division
2501 E. Sahara Avenue, #102
Las Vegas, NV 89104-4137
NV Association of REALTORS
760 Margrave Drive, Ste. 200
Reno, NV 89510
Sierra Nevada Association of REALTORS
300 South Curry St., #3
Carson City, NV 89703
Greater Las Vegas
Association of REALTORS
1750 East Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, NV 89104
State of Nevada
Dept. of Business & Industry
State Real Estate Division
INTERNET PAGE:
http://www.red.nv.us
http://red.state.nv.us/realestate/agenda/2005/red_Agenda_2005-10-24.pdf
Register of Actions
ReplyDeleteCase No. 03A474758
Kenneth Buck Jr, Karen Buck vs Universal Knowledge Network Inc, Educational Clearing House Inc, et al §
§
§
§
§
§
Case Type: Other Torts
Subtype: Fraud/Misrepresentation
Date Filed: 10/08/2003
Location: Department 18
Conversion Case Number: A474758
Party Information
Lead Attorneys
Also Known As
Fields, Terry
Also Known As
Figliuzzi, Theresa
Also Known As
Moseley, Terry
Also Known As
Mosley, Terri
Also Known As
Mosley, Theresa
Other real estate complaints have been filed, but since Terry Figliuzzi Mosley, real estate license has been revoked, IF SHE EVER PAYS HER FINES...THE OTHER COMPLAINT'S AGAINST HER, COME IN TO PLAY...
Let's play, and let the people know more about the unethical behavior that this predator has!!!!!
very nice thanks for sharing.............
ReplyDelete___________________
Smarry
For 3 Months Enjoy Free 28 Premium Movie Channels
Terry - Please contact us. We have evidence of Eighth Judiciary Fraud - 702-787-0002
ReplyDeleteSure you do Terry. Nice post to yourself.
ReplyDeleteOr are you that nutty Wiesner lady?
ReplyDeleteAnything new on this thieving byyyach? In jail? Active warrants?
ReplyDeleteThis woman, is laying looooooow to the ground. From what I heard, Terry Figliuzzi aka Terry Fields aka Terry Mosley contacted the D.A.'s office threatening David Roger's. Isn't it strange that this woman can steal from other's, threaten judge's with ethical complaints, and now threaten our D.A., who is up for re-election. Believe me, I would put detectives on the BIG RED TRUCK which her son drives and follow him, to mommy's new home. Now, that is what a smart person would do. Then follow up, on the warrants for her arrest. Her victim's will at least have the satisfaction that she is in Detention for her criminal behavior. Where's the furniture. Terry, that you took from your landlords home? Where's the money that you took, using your son's name? Where's your integrity, Terry?
ReplyDeleteArrest Record
ReplyDelete"Terry Mosley"
Las Vegas / Clark County / Arrest Records / Terry M Mosley
Las Vegas Arrest Record for Terry M Mosley
Inmate Name:Mosley, Terry M
Inmate #:01516003
Last Arrest Date:01:00AM 03-17-2009
Sex:Female
Race:White
Age/DOB:51 / 12-20-57
Height:
Weight:
Inmate Location & Arrest Information
Charges Resulting from Arrest on 03/17/2009
Detention Facility: CCDC
1.Theft (felony)Counts: 1Bond:$850.00
2. Non Sufficient Funds/checks Counts: 1 Bond:$350.00
3. Non Sufficient Funds/checks Counts: 1 Bond:$350.00
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/las-vegas-nv/TDEF462S90HV2JCT4
ReplyDeleteJUDGE DONALD MOSLEY, 'CURRENTLY DATING' ANOTHER LOSER;
ReplyDeleteONCE ARRESTED FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND
WARRANT ISSUED...
Las Vegas / Clark County / Arrest Records / Dana Marie Chavez Share
Las Vegas Arrest Record for Dana Marie Chavez
Inmate Name:Chavez, Dana Marie
Inmate #:896901
Last Arrest Date:09/15/2010
Sex:Female
Race:Hispanic
Age/DOB:41
Height:
Weight:
Inmate Location & Arrest Information
Charges Resulting from Arrest on 09/15/2010
Detention Facility: LVDC
1.No Prf Ins Veh 10.02.010/485.187Counts: 1Bond: $0.00
Curious, if Judge Mosley will get warrant quashed for current girlfriend, DANA MARIE CHAVEZ-PERRY-WINN, especially since he OR'd her, on her domestic violence case.
ReplyDeleteHOW MANY GIRLS, IS HE CURRENTLY DATING WITH A BAD REPUTATION?
His son is 19 years old, who still lives in "daddy's" home, because HE too, is a loser! Didn't even go through high school graduation, because the schools removed him and recommended adult education classes to get a diploma. Heard that uncle DANNY, is removing him from any inheritance . Thank God, there is one MOSLEY, who knows what to do!
1) DANA MARIE CHAVEZ - PERRY
ReplyDeletehttps://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/49224_100001733588073_1562550_n.jpg
2) ARREST PHOTO: THERESA MARIE FIGLIUZZI-FIELDS FROM THE REVIEW JOURNAL
http://media.lvrj.com/images/Mosley.jpg
Charge Information
ReplyDeleteCharges: Mosley, Theresa Marie
Statute
Level
Date
1. THEFT (FELONY) 205.0832 Felony 05/04/2009
Events & Orders of the Court
09/01/2011 Motion to Quash Bench Warrant (9:00 AM) (Judicial Officer Vega, Valorie J.)
09/01/2011, 09/08/2011, 09/22/2011
Motion and Notice of Motion to Place on Calendar to Quash Warrant, Set Reasonable Bail
Minutes
09/01/2011 9:00 AM
- Ms. Ferreira advised this is Mr. Chen's case. Mr. Semenza stated Deft was Indicted with a $5,000 bond and is in custody in Henderson with a case related to this charge which has not been dismissed. Court noted they are soon to be dismissed. Mr. Semenza asked to quash the warrant and set bail in the reasonable amount and set an arraignment date. Matter trailed for Mr. Chen. MATTER RECALLED: Ms. Ferreira advised Mr. Chen is in Henderson court and will not be able to be here. Mr. Semenza requested one week to have Deft here. COURT ORDERED, matter CONTINUED. 9/08/11 9:00 AM DEFT'S MOTION TO QUASH THE WARRANT AND SET REASONABLE BAIL WARRANT (O.R.)
09/08/2011 9:00 AM
- Side bar. Court noted counsel is requesting two weeks. COURT ORDERED, matter CONTINUED two weeks. WARRANT (O.R.) 9/22/11 9:00 AM MOTION TO QUASH WARRANT AND SET REASONABLE BAIL
09/22/2011 9:00 AM
- Court advised she received no written opposition from the State. Mr. Chen advised he understood the Court was going to Recuse. Court stated at conference at the bench, she was advised that Theresa Mosley has a child in common with one of her colleagues and that child will be a witness adult and she doesn't know him personally but the colleague may be called was a witness and counsel indicated he didn't know if he would be a witness. Mr. Chen stated it's a strong possibility he will be a witness in this case and a record was made at the Grand Jury that bail was set at $5,000 and he thought it was a reasonable bail. He stated he would like to see the Deft do a walk through and she post bail because of her tactic not to make herself available. Mr. Semenza stated Deft did appear and was placed on Intensive Supervision then it was modified to a straight O.R. with no failure to appear and he asked to quash the warrant; however, she had a walk through in Henderson, has no assets, has maintained good contact and has not been arraigned. COURT ORDERED, motion to quash warrant GRANTED and O.R. RELEASE GRANTED. DEFT.MOSLEY ARRAIGNED, PLED NOT GUILTY, and WAIVED the 60-DAY RULE. COURT ORDERED, matter set for trial. Mr. Chen stated the likelihood that Judge Mosley is a witness is high. FURTHER ORDERED, matter set in two weeks for the State to do a due diligence, contact Michael Mosley and let the Court know if he is calling his father or not and matter set for a status check to set the calendar call and trial date and Defendant to be present. Side bar. O.R. 10/06/11 9:00 AM STATUS CHECK: SET CALENDAR CALL AND TRIAL DATE
Parties Present
Return to Register of Actions
Linda Harvell & Brittany Jennings 2 Girls of JUDGE DON MOSLEY
ReplyDeletehttp://www.topix.com/forum/city/las-vegas-nv/TDEF462S90HV2JCT4
Since the recent break-up of District Court Dept. 14 Judge Don Mosley, he is out doing what he loves to do. If he isn't chasing skirts, laying under the sheets, and working hard to get between the legs, than you don't know Judge Don Mosley.
This old man, will soon be 64 years of age. If he isn't collecting more "age" spots than he is buying more viagra to handle his new 27 year old squeeze: Brittany. Brittany, who recently divorced her husband Bryan, doesn't realize that this old man, should be called: "Grandpa" verses "Hon." Other issues, this old man is trying to figure out who he should celebrate "HAPPY BIRTHDAY" tunes with. Should it be Linda Harvell, who constantly calls the judge with her tears of distress saying: "Don, it's Linda."
What are the chances that he will catch a Southwest flight to Napa Valley, to be with Denise, to lend a shoulder or should I say, lend something. This Bimbo,is also going through her maritial issues, with the much needed advise of the "old" judge. But leave it to Don, he is there with wine in right hand and viagra in the left.
Maybe, his recent roll in the hay with Cheryl from Tulsa, will catch another Southwest flight to Las Vegas. She can give this old geezer a fresh bottle of maple syrup to go with his "famous" pancakes.
I don't think he will be spending his 64th birthday with TK. She is the (former) fiancee, who left him, for a much younger man who isn't chauvanistic.
Linda isn't the one, Cheryl isn't the one, Pam isn't the one, Denise isn't the one, TK isn't the one, and it's for damn sure Brittany, with two kids and an x husband, WON'T BE THE ONE. She may be one of the girls under the sheets RIGHT NOW, but she won't be the future, THAT'S WHAT HE TOLD JOHN.
Just remember have this old man/judge wear protection, FOR
Judge Mosley, as long as he has lived in Las Vegas, Nevada, has been known as a NO NONSENSE JUDGE. The problem is his personal life. He NEVER has been one to commitmet to ANY WOMAN. The issue's that he has had with the different women in his life happens to be his EGO. He isn't faithful to ANYONE! I know, I dated him. Don, lacks any patience. He throws things, he lies to you, when he says: "He loves you" "You fit well together, while having sex" "You're it!" and "I want no one else". Now, here is the interesting part: He has major issues with wearing a condom. Please, please, please listen to what I have to say, for any woman out there, who is interested in dating this man...HAVE HIM WEAR A CONDOM!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteHe will tell you, that he can't give you anything, when there isn't an outbreak. This is where "No Honor Don" comes into play. He lacks ethics, he lacks morals, and he lacks the honesty in which having sex will protect the woman's health! He is a shelfish BASTARD when it comes to coming! Beware, because I bought into the bullshit, and I would hate for another woman to get hurt emotionally, as well as physically. Buying a girl a dinner, fixing her dinner, taking her to Tahoe on a judicial conference, where never be enough to compensate for GOOD HEALTH! wow read on......
ecord Count: 25
ReplyDeleteSearch By: Party Party Search Mode: Name Last Name: mosley First Name: terry Case Status: All Sort By: Filed Date
Case Number Citation Number Style/Defendant Info Filed/Location Type/Status Charge(s)
94A329214
Terry Mosley vs Tamera Hill, Neil Kelley
01/18/1994
Department 17
Negligence - Auto
Closed
98A387705
Allegro Acceptance Corp vs Terry Mosley
04/30/1998
Department 20
Breach of Contract
Closed
99A407255
Dempsey Roberts And Smith Ltd vs Terry Figliuzzi
08/20/1999
Department 29
Civil Conversion Case Type
Closed
99A408639
Mary Crosswhite vs Terry Mosley, General Realty
09/27/1999
Department 6
Other Torts
Closed
00A419206
Terry Mosley vs K Leavitt, Jason Landess
05/19/2000
Department 10
Other Torts
Closed
01A444261
Sean Mahan vs Terry Mosley
12/24/2001
Department 13
Landlord/Tenant
Closed
01A444274
Sean Mahan vs Terry Mosley
12/26/2001
Department 6
Landlord/Tenant
Closed
02A456221
Gaming Ventures Of Las Vegas Inc vs Terry Mosley
09/12/2002
Department 13
Breach of Contract
Closed
03A467196
Ramm Corp vs Roger Dieleman, T And M Land Co LLC, et al
05/05/2003
Department 21
Breach of Contract
Closed
03A467799
Terra Concepts LLC vs T And M Land Company LLC, Terry Mosley, et al
05/16/2003
Department 21
Breach of Contract
Closed
03A467996
Terry Mosley vs James Hogan MD, Donald Taylor, et al
05/22/2003
Department 10
Negligence - Other
Closed
03A470720
Nolan Merritt vs Terry Mosley
07/17/2003
Department 6
Breach of Contract
Closed
03A474758
Kenneth Buck Jr, Karen Buck vs Universal Knowledge Network Inc, Educational Clearing House Inc, et al
10/08/2003
Department 18
Other Torts
Closed
03A478105
S And B Assoc LLC vs Terry Mosley
12/19/2003
Department 23
Breach of Contract
Closed
03A478197
S And B Assoc LLC vs First Integrity Financial Group Inc
12/23/2003
Department 11
Other Civil Filing
Closed
04A487012
Edyth Fitzpatrick vs M D M Trust Revocable Business Trust, Terry Mosley, et al
06/10/2004
Department Unassigned
Other Real Property
Reopened
04A487242
Monica Williams, Benjamin Williams vs Terry Mosley, MDM Trust, et al
06/15/2004
Department 18
Title to Property
Closed
05A511932
Spartan Management Group LLC vs Roger Dieleman, Violet Tracht, et al
10/20/2005
Department 17
Title to Property
Closed
06A515478
Nevada Title Co vs Roger Dieleman, Violet Tracht, et al
01/09/2006
Department 17
Other Civil Filing
Closed
06A518751
Roger Dieleman vs Terry Mosley
03/14/2006
Department 12
Breach of Contract
Closed
06A526270
Roger Dieleman vs Terry Mosley
08/10/2006
Department 17
Breach of Contract
Closed
06A527373
Matthew Q Callister Inc vs Terry Mosley
08/29/2006
Department 20
Breach of Contract
Closed
06A532219
Riccardo Ingrassia vs TMM Trust, Terry Mosley
11/30/2006
Department 29
Title to Property
Closed
07A536175
Riccardo Ingrassia vs Terry Mosley
02/14/2007
Department 29
Transfer from Justice Court
Closed
C-11-275723-1
Mosley, Theresa Marie
08/24/2011
Department 17
Felony/Gross Misdemeanor
Reactivated
THEFT (FELONY)
T.K.,
ReplyDeleteHave you no shame? How long are you going to stalk Terry Mosley and Dana Gentry? How can you write about yourself and think no one knows it's you?
You are going to end up in a padded room if you continue your blogging. And here is a pity hint:
A 5 year old could identify a paragraph written by you.
For everyone - this freak is none other than TFML Tk Crabb. She is the laughingstock known as ErRATIc CAppS .
Register of Actions
ReplyDeleteCase No. C-11-275723-1
State of Nevada vs Theresa Mosley §
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
Case Type: Felony/Gross Misdemeanor
Date Filed: 08/24/2011
Location: Department 17
Cross-Reference Case Number: C275723
Defendant's Scope ID #: 1516003
Grand Jury Case Number: 11AGJ022
Party Information
Lead Attorneys
Defendant Mosley, Theresa Marie Also Known As Mosley, Terry Marie Lawrence J. Semenza
Retained
702-835-6803(W)
Plaintiff State of Nevada Steven B Wolfson
702-671-2700(W)
Charge Information
Charges: Mosley, Theresa Marie Statute Level Date
1. THEFT (FELONY) 205.0832 Felony 05/04/2009
Events & Orders of the Court
10/23/2014 Sentencing (8:15 AM) (Judicial Officer Villani, Michael)
Minutes
10/23/2014 8:15 AM
- Leah Beverly, Dep DA, present on behalf of the State and Lawrence Semenza, Esq., present on behalf of Deft. Mosley, who is also present. Ms. Beverly advised that she has two (2) Victim Witness Speakers; however, neither one of them were noticed. Court advised that unless the parties stipulate to letting them speak, they will be excluded because they were not properly noticed. Mr. Semenza requested that the Victim Speakers be EXCLUDED. COURT SO ORDERED. Pursuant to the Jury's verdict, DEFT. MOSLEY ADJUDGED GUILTY of THEFT (F). Argument by Ms. Beverly; Deft. failed to appear for her Presentence Investigation (PSI) interview. Statement by Deft. Argument by Mr. Semenza; this started out as a landlord/tenant dispute and simply blew out of control. COURT ORDERED, in addition to the $25.00 Administrative Assessment fee, the $150.00 DNA Analysis fee including testing to determine genetic markers, and the Restitution in an amount to be determined, Deft. SENTENCED to a MAXIMUM of THIRTY-SIX (36) MONTHS and a MINIMUM of TWELVE (12) MONTHS in the Nevada Department of Corrections (NDC), with ONE (1) DAY credit for time served, SUSPENDED; placed on PROBATION for an indeterminate period not to exceed FIVE (5) YEARS. CONDITIONS: 1. Comply with an imposed curfew by Parole and Probation (P&P) as deemed necessary. 2. No contact whatsoever with the victim or the victim's family. 3. Within the first forty-five (45) days of probation, Deft. to undergo an Impulse Control evaluation and enter and complete a counseling program as deemed necessary by the evaluator. 4. Complete any other therapeutic counseling program deemed appropriate by P&P. 5. Report to P&P within twenty-four (24) hours of sentencing to be assigned a Probation Officer. Court advised that the restitution issue will be resolved at a later date; a Restitution Hearing will be set. The Court's main concern in this case is the payment of restitution and, therefore, this Court would be amenable to an earlier discharge from probation if the restitution has been paid in full and all conditions have been completed. COURT ORDERED, matter set for hearing on restitution. NIC 01/09/15 9:30 AM HEARING: RESTITUTION
hahahahaha probation!!!!!
ReplyDeletehahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah!!!!!!!!
I know, probation! This woman is a career criminal, who dresses in St. John.
Delete
ReplyDeleteno wonder mosely sleeps around - you bitches should get a room already.
TK Crabb FINALLY SLAPPED BY NEVADA COURTS
ReplyDeleteTFML Tawanna's ruthless and relentless harassment of Dana Gentry and Jon Ralston is finally over. She was not able to provide one scintilla of evidence and for that she is going to pay ... $10,000 damages per individual for starters. When the dust settles, this case will rightfully leave T.K. bankrupt and a judiciary laughingstock. Hopefully she will stop being such a trouble making nuisance and and go back to being the infamous internet troll TFML. Or maybe she will learn to live a normal life - get a job and leave people alone.
For all those harmed by this vicious bitch, we joyfully present some sweet justice for your viewing entertainment (as she did to so many of us):
Case No: A-11-653286-C
The only piece of "evidence" that Plaintiff submitted in support of her claims was a
self-serving declaration that regurgitated the same conclusory allegations from her Complaint.
The Court finds that Plaintiff made only the feeblest of attempts to carry her burden to show falsity, and in doing so, fell far short of the mark of persuading the Court that there is, in fact,any falsity in any of the Media Defendants' remarks as they apply to Plaintiff. It is unfathomable that Plaintiff in her declaration would offer no documentation or exhibits to corroborate her unsupported denials and averments. That Plaintiff would choose not to submit any supporting evidence leads the
Court to only one conclusion: there are no such documents establishing any falsehood was recklessly uttered by the Media Defendants.
Because she cannot demonstrate with prima facia evidence that any of the statements
in the News Segment were false or made with malice, Plaintiff seeks to manufacture a false light claim by linking vague, non-factual comments by the Media Defendants to the factual statements in the News Segment. In other words, Plaintiff argued that the Media Defendants' truthful statements were cast in a false light because of general comments that did not convey any actual facts. Plaintiff repeatedly asserted that "the Defendants' statements paint Ms. Crabb in a false light by (i) intimating that there was some type of collusion between Ms. Crabb, Judge Mosley and Judge Walsh; (ii) suggesting that Ms. Crabb had conspired to commit bankruptcy fraud; and (iii) intimating that Ms. Crabb used her position as the Judge's fiancé to obtain benefits that other individuals would be unable to obtain." Plaintiff cannot claim
that the Media Defendants actually made these statements so she is forced to allege that the Media Defendants "intimated," "suggested," or otherwise implied an untruthful fact that cast Plaintiff in a false light. Plaintiff's reliance on innuendo in the absence of any verifiable false statements of fact is improper.
Tawanna K. Crabb cannot "rely on innuendo, speculation or conjecture to make her case" for a viable false light claim. But the law is unequivocal that Plaintiff cannot prevail on a false light claim by speculating about what negative impression a viewer may take away from the Media Defendants' factual reporting on former Judge Mosley's alleged conduct.
Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to prove by prima facie evidence a probability of prevailing on her false light claim at trial. That claim
must, therefore, be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to NRS 41.660. The Court further grants the Media Defendants' Special Motion to Dismiss as to Plaintiffs' claims for negligence.
Based on the foregoing, the Court finds that Plaintiff's lawsuit is an impermissible SLAPP lawsuit under NRS 41.660. Accordingly, the Court hereby grants the Media Defendants leave to file a memorandum of attorney's fees and costs incurred in defending against this lawsuit as well as supplemental documentation or testimonial evidence to support an award of damages to each of the Media Defendants for $10,000 each.
11/22/2016 9:00 AM
ReplyDelete- GREENSPUN MEDIA GROUP, LLC AND LAS VEGAS SUN, INC'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS...CO-DEFENDANT'S JON RALSTON AND DANA GENTRY'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES, COSTS, AND INTEREST Court noted it had reviewed everything, including Ms. Crabb's November 7, 2016, Opposition and the Defendants' Reply. Ms. Crabb contends that the defense fees cannot be reasonable because they exceed her own attorney's fees but the Court does not find that persuasive. The notion that the prevailing party's fees must be unreasonable if they exceed the unsuccessful litigant's fees and costs really flies in the face of reason and courts have routinely held when asked that the amount of fees incurred by the opposition parties is irrelevant to the determination of whether a prevailing parties' fees and costs are reasonable. In stead, in Nevada, when determining whether or not attorney's fees are fair, reasonable and necessary, we look to the four factors in Brunzell v. Golden Gate. Ms. Crabb concedes in her opposition that she does not challenge the quality or skill of her adversary counsel, she simply fees their fees were too high, but that does not answer the Brunzell factors. The quality of the advocates are not in dispute; the character of the work done in this complex cases spanning five years, including a trip to the Nevada Supreme Court; that the work performed was substantial and substantive; and the result speaks for itself. COURT FINDS all of the Brunzell factors demonstrates that the attorney's fees sought are fair, reasonable and necessary. Ms. Crabb contends that not all fees and costs were directly attributable to the Anti-Slap suit. In this regard, the COURT FINDS the Ninth Circuit case of Graham-Suit v. Clainos instructive. There the Court held that the Anti-Slap statute is intended to compensate a defendant for the expense of responding to a slap suit. To this end, the provision is broadly construed so as to effectuate the legislative purpose of reimbursing the prevailing defendant for expenses incurred in extracting itself from a baseless lawsuit. Her, plaintiff's suit was baseless and the Graham-Suit v. Clainos supports this Court determination that the attorney's fees are all, nevertheless, fair, reasonable and necessarily incurred. Finally, Ms. Crabb contends that the amount of Defendants' attorney's fees are unreasonable, however she offers no supporting legal reasoning, citation or factual analysis. It is well established that when a contestant seeks to reduce the number of hours worked by a fee claimant, it must appear that the time claimed is obviously and convincingly excessive under the circumstances. COURT ORDERED Motion GRANTED; Attorney's Fees and Costs are to be awarded as fair, reasonable and necessary incurred, as follows: As to Defendants Dana Gentry and Jon Ralston: $94,227.50 in Attorney's Fees and $6,625.16 in Costs; these defendants have opted not to pursue statutory damages under NRS 41.670 and no statutory damages will be awarded. As to Co-Defendants Greenspun Media Group, LLC and Las Vegas Sun, Inc: $67,458.30 in Attorney's Fees and $591.44 in Costs. Ms. Crabb reargued her motion for reconsideration. Court stated it had previously denied the motion for reconsideration explaining its ruling in great detail and today is only a hearing about attorney's fees. Court DIRECTED Mr. Erwin and Ms. Noto to prepare their respective orders to the Court for signature within 10 days pursuant to EDCR 7.21.
SO WHAT DOES THIS PATHETIC MORON DO BUT FILE AN APPEAL!
ReplyDelete$170,000 should have been enough to shut this STUPID bitch up once and for all. They took pity choosing not to seek the statutory damages - BUT THEY SHOULD HAVE KNOWN BETTER. This monster just doesn't deserve anything but punishment.
She has no case at all - NOTHING - and Mosley obviously can't help her in the District. No one could be that stupid to continue.
Well I say keep up the good work TFML! Rack up some more legal fees smart girl. It is a pleasure to watch.