@8:46 I don't blame you. Bell is a huge disappointment. She's nice enough. She just doesn't seem to possess good legal reasoning skills. She sort of makes it up as she goes along. Unfortunately, the name alone will get her two more terms.
Stefany Miley in every civil case - she is dumb and unpredictable. Often we cannot discern what her ruling actually was and are left scratching our heads alongside opposing counsel. There is no clarity of thought at all with her. And while none of us has yet had a civil trial with her, we refuse to expose our clients to that risk.
I have only been practicing here two and a half years after having practiced in another state for 17How did such a complete boob become a judge? Is the electorate here really that ill-informed?
What's the point of using a judicial challenge anyway? You still might draw another terrible judge (Walsh, Vega, Levitt, Williams, Miley, Smith, or Bixler). On the other than, terrible judges might help promote settlement. Think about it...
Interesting bit of news today. David Schieck, THE Special Public Defender, was found to have offered ineffective assistance of counsel in a case. To be fair, I'm sure most defense attorneys have faced these claims, and many have lost. Case is Charlene Snyder. If anyone doesn't remember, this was a horrible child neglect case. Google the name.
ALLF, NANCY LEE VOY, WILLIAM OAKS SANCHEZ, GLORIA JOAN SLOMINSKI JONES, STEVEN EMRYS TEUTON, ROBERT WARREN HOSKIN, CHARLES JOSEPH SCISCENTO, JOSEPH SALVATORE SARAGOSA, MELISSA ANN BENNETT-HARON, KAREN BONAVENTURE, JOSEPH MAXIMILLIAN and ANDRESS-TOBIASSON, MELANIE
Oh, how wonderful, I have to send a check to a former Gage associate because he is running against Allf. Oh well, I have been known to send checks to Democrats, so why not to Gage-ites? Plus, he probably at least knows the rules of civil procedure.
@ 9:52 so there's no longer any doubt that he completely blew the "do no harm" promise, doesn't even have to do time at Club Fed & keeps his license. Our system has gone completely haywire. And despite the tax evasion rap Awand is apparently still not threatened enough to give anything up. The blatantly corrupt are more organized & tight than the other side. What a crying shame.
First of all, 8:23, get your facts straight if you want any credibility with your posts. Awand was never convicted of "tax evasion," but "failure to pay," which is a misdemeanor, and rarely commands any prison time, since we abolished debtor prisons as part of our "breaking away from England." Secondly, it is highly unlikely that the government is going to win their "fraud" trial since there is no evidence that Gage's decision was based upon corruption. The Judge is not going to allow Kabins to testify regarding his subjective beliefs. Third, you must not do much , if any, criminal law if you don't "get" why Kabins took this deal even if he was entirely innocent of wrongdoing. By the way, what evidence do YOU have that, apparently, the feds have not managed to find, or manufacture, since there are no indictments after 5 1/2 years after the investigation began. Also, how do you deal with those 5 year statute of limitations? Awand has been long gone for over 5 years now. Sorry, but looks like you will just have to beat Vannah and Eglet in court, the old fashioned way. Good luck with your trial skills.
If you have to ask what is wrong with Steinheimer you either: (a) don't practice in 2nd Judicial regularly; (b) you're still wet behind your ears; (c) you've had your head buried in the sand for the last 10 years; or (d) all of the above.
As for peremptory challenges, typically automatics would be Vega, Doug Smith and S-Miley. Smith is the worst, candidly I have never appeared in front of him in which he has read the pleadings. Recently he has taken to not understanding that "summary judgment" does not mean "summarily weigh the evidence and determine what I think is reasonable."
If I am a Defendant, Willams. Good judge, at least to half the bar.
4:23 or (e), all the cases you've had in front of Steinheimer, including those stinky turds, resulted in gold, so why preempt a good thing coming, even if she is out there!
Complaints vs. Dispute vs. Decision and Order ? Legal Rights vs. 3rd Party Insurance co. vs. Waste of tax payer monies vs. State workers comp agencys vs. Influenced company presidents not State agency vs. Injured worker in Nevada vs. State Legislature Nevada vs. conflict of interests vs. Owner of Insurance company vs. Disabled person me vs. Conclusion of law vs. Change of care vs. Denial vs. conspiracy and fraud vs. Big Bear vs. Crying Doctor vs. convictions vs. Letters that Quackenbush says we all make mistakes vs. Judgement of others vs. Facts like mine vs. Fraud vs. lobbyist with his own interests vs. Big Bear vs. A small part of Kabins net-work vs. I have tapes vs. set your self free . Melodie Simon is only part of a problem in Nevada vs. Please look among these issues and you will find more news if wanted.
Bunch of salesman/women selling over par. Kabinectomy $$$, End of year residuals,bonuses,partners split, wow! sales 101. (rookies)maybe just backed unlawfully.
Question: With which Judges do you most often use your peremptory challenge to get a new judge?
ReplyDelete- I will always ditch Judge Linda Bell
Not that it applies to most of the readership here - but for me, it's Steinheimer.
ReplyDelete@8:46
ReplyDeleteI don't blame you. Bell is a huge disappointment. She's nice enough. She just doesn't seem to possess good legal reasoning skills. She sort of makes it up as she goes along. Unfortunately, the name alone will get her two more terms.
Walsh. I know it is obvious, but she has made some of the strangest decisions I've ever witnessed. That blank botox stare. Can't take it.
ReplyDeleteWe are getting there with Miley at my firm.
Denton if it is a case in which decisions will need to be made at an early stage.
Bixler, Doug Smith
ReplyDeleteStefany Miley in every civil case - she is dumb and unpredictable. Often we cannot discern what her ruling actually was and are left scratching our heads alongside opposing counsel. There is no clarity of thought at all with her. And while none of us has yet had a civil trial with her, we refuse to expose our clients to that risk.
ReplyDeleteI have only been practicing here two and a half years after having practiced in another state for 17How did such a complete boob become a judge? Is the electorate here really that ill-informed?
Mark Kabins pled guilty yesterday with little fanfare. Apparently he gets to keep his license to pracice medicine.
ReplyDeleteVillani sucks ass.
ReplyDeleteWhat's the point of using a judicial challenge anyway? You still might draw another terrible judge (Walsh, Vega, Levitt, Williams, Miley, Smith, or Bixler). On the other than, terrible judges might help promote settlement. Think about it...
ReplyDeleteI will pre-empt Glass any time I wind up before her. The woman has a profound disregard for statutory language.
ReplyDeleteI'm addicted to 'Jersey Shore'...can't stop watching it!
ReplyDeleteHigh School Reunion on TV Land, a reality show about Chaparral High School's graduating class of 1989's 20 year reunion is great tv.
ReplyDeleteInteresting bit of news today. David Schieck, THE Special Public Defender, was found to have offered ineffective assistance of counsel in a case. To be fair, I'm sure most defense attorneys have faced these claims, and many have lost.
ReplyDeleteCase is Charlene Snyder. If anyone doesn't remember, this was a horrible child neglect case. Google the name.
10:22 nailed it.
ReplyDeleteUnless you draw the undisputed least common denominator (and there are so many candidates here), why ding the judge?
Walsh is bad, so are Smith, Williams, Vega (and Miley by reputation - I haven't had the "pleasure") . . .
last day to file as a judicial candy-date. Get your packets in by 5:00.
ReplyDeleteSee who has already filed here:
http://redrock.co.clark.nv.us/candfile/
Looks like the unopposed will be:
ReplyDeleteALLF, NANCY LEE
VOY, WILLIAM OAKS
SANCHEZ, GLORIA JOAN SLOMINSKI
JONES, STEVEN EMRYS
TEUTON, ROBERT WARREN
HOSKIN, CHARLES JOSEPH
SCISCENTO, JOSEPH SALVATORE
SARAGOSA, MELISSA ANN
BENNETT-HARON, KAREN
BONAVENTURE, JOSEPH MAXIMILLIAN
and
ANDRESS-TOBIASSON, MELANIE
Is Melanie as pretty in real life? She looks like a model on her campaign posters.
ReplyDeletewhat is wrong with Steinheimer?
ReplyDeleteThree cheers for:
ReplyDeleteBECKSTEAD, BLAINE D
stepping up against Allf.
Oh great, Gage's former assiciate on the bench.
ReplyDeleteI don't care who is running against her, ANYONE BUT ALLF.
ReplyDeleteOh, how wonderful, I have to send a check to a former Gage associate because he is running against Allf. Oh well, I have been known to send checks to Democrats, so why not to Gage-ites? Plus, he probably at least knows the rules of civil procedure.
ReplyDeleteI always challenge Miley (civil) and Pomrenze (family).
ReplyDeleteIt appears this Blaine guy testified against Gage at trial. That's interesting. Well, he gets my voice over Allf any day.
ReplyDelete@ 9:52 so there's no longer any doubt that he completely blew the "do no harm" promise, doesn't even have to do time at Club Fed & keeps his license. Our system has gone completely haywire. And despite the tax evasion rap Awand is apparently still not threatened enough to give anything up. The blatantly corrupt are more organized & tight than the other side. What a crying shame.
ReplyDeleteWow - Melania Tobiasson really doctored up her photo on her campaign billboards.
ReplyDeletehttp://bit.ly/73WsoL
@10:00am Yeah - and deleted her Facebook account. I don't blame her - I wonder what was on it that she did not want seen?
ReplyDeleteCached copy at: http://bit.ly/8YUghJ
First of all, 8:23, get your facts straight if you want any credibility with your posts. Awand was never convicted of "tax evasion," but "failure to pay," which is a misdemeanor, and rarely commands any prison time, since we abolished debtor prisons as part of our "breaking away from England." Secondly, it is highly unlikely that the government is going to win their "fraud" trial since there is no evidence that Gage's decision was based upon corruption. The Judge is not going to allow Kabins to testify regarding his subjective beliefs. Third, you must not do much , if any, criminal law if you don't "get" why Kabins took this deal even if he was entirely innocent of wrongdoing. By the way, what evidence do YOU have that, apparently, the feds have not managed to find, or manufacture, since there are no indictments after 5 1/2 years after the investigation began. Also, how do you deal with those 5 year statute of limitations? Awand has been long gone for over 5 years now. Sorry, but looks like you will just have to beat Vannah and Eglet in court, the old fashioned way. Good luck with your trial skills.
ReplyDeleteSusan Johnson is an automatic for me
ReplyDeleteIf you have to ask what is wrong with Steinheimer you either: (a) don't practice in 2nd Judicial regularly; (b) you're still wet behind your ears; (c) you've had your head buried in the sand for the last 10 years; or (d) all of the above.
ReplyDeleteI live in Vegas, so it is (a)...
ReplyDeleteI live in Vegas, so it is (a)...
ReplyDeleteAs for peremptory challenges, typically automatics would be Vega, Doug Smith and S-Miley. Smith is the worst, candidly I have never appeared in front of him in which he has read the pleadings. Recently he has taken to not understanding that "summary judgment" does not mean "summarily weigh the evidence and determine what I think is reasonable."
ReplyDeleteIf I am a Defendant, Willams. Good judge, at least to half the bar.
4:23 or (e), all the cases you've had in front of Steinheimer, including those stinky turds, resulted in gold, so why preempt a good thing coming, even if she is out there!
ReplyDeleteComplaints vs. Dispute vs. Decision and Order ? Legal Rights vs. 3rd Party Insurance co. vs. Waste of tax payer monies vs. State workers comp agencys vs. Influenced company presidents not State agency vs. Injured worker in Nevada vs. State Legislature Nevada vs. conflict of interests vs. Owner of Insurance company vs. Disabled person me vs. Conclusion of law vs. Change of care vs. Denial vs. conspiracy and fraud vs. Big Bear vs. Crying Doctor vs. convictions vs. Letters that Quackenbush says we all make mistakes vs. Judgement of others vs. Facts like mine vs. Fraud vs. lobbyist with his own interests vs. Big Bear vs. A small part of Kabins net-work vs. I have tapes vs. set your self free . Melodie Simon is only part of a problem in Nevada vs. Please look among these issues and you will find more news if wanted.
ReplyDeleteBunch of salesman/women selling over par. Kabinectomy $$$, End of year residuals,bonuses,partners split, wow! sales 101. (rookies)maybe just backed unlawfully.
ReplyDelete