In Halverson news, the Review-Journal reports the judge's attorney wants to be removed as counsel in her civil suit because apparently the country's most famous five hundred pound jurist hasn't paid her lawyer.
Meanwhile, Nevada judicial nominees recently gathered to answer voters' questions about what makes them the best candidate to sit in judgment. The Review-Journal reports Judge Del Vecchio was in fine form, dropping one liners left and right.
[Maybe one of Judge Del Vecchio's jokes should have been "What's the difference between me and a child molestor? A child molestor isn't elected!" Ha ha ha. Why is he still on the bench?]
Meanwhile, Nevada judicial nominees recently gathered to answer voters' questions about what makes them the best candidate to sit in judgment. The Review-Journal reports Judge Del Vecchio was in fine form, dropping one liners left and right.
[Maybe one of Judge Del Vecchio's jokes should have been "What's the difference between me and a child molestor? A child molestor isn't elected!" Ha ha ha. Why is he still on the bench?]
No comments:
Post a Comment