Showing posts with label Regional Justice Center. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Regional Justice Center. Show all posts

Friday, September 17, 2010

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Sidebar: Race to the Advertising Bottom?

Scene: A bikini-clad woman standing on the southeast corner of the Regional Justice Center holding a large sign advertising traffic ticket services for Vegas Ticket Masters.

Discuss.

Monday, July 26, 2010

Ewwwwwww!

Looks like weapons and faulty security cameras aren't the only things we have to worry about when visiting the RJC. A helpful tipster passed along this little gem:
From: Sommermeyer, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 2:40 PM
To: [redacted]
Cc: [redacted]
Subject: Health and Safety Alert

A case of whooping cough (pertussis) was suspected and identified today (7/21/2010) at the Regional Justice Center. Whooping cough is very contagious and can be spread quickly among individuals who have not been immunized against it. This email is not meant to cause panic, but to advise you of the symptoms of the disease so that you are better prepared. If you suspect you may be ill, contact a doctor immediately. Please share this information with anyone without access to the court email system.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), whooping cough is still very much a public health concern. Here is a list of sypmtoms and indications that the disease may be present:

Symptoms:
Once you become infected with whooping cough, it takes three to 12 days for signs and symptoms to appear. They're usually mild at first and resemble those of a common cold:

Runny nose
Nasal congestion
Sneezing
Red, watery eyes
A mild fever
Dry cough
After a week or two, signs and symptoms worsen. Severe and prolonged coughing attacks may:

Bring up thick phlegm
Provoke vomiting
Result in a red or blue face
Cause extreme fatigue
End with a high-pitched "whoop" sound during the next breath of air
However, many people — particularly infants, adolescents and adults — don't develop the characteristic whoop. Sometimes, a persistent hacking cough is the only sign that an adolescent or adult has whooping cough.

When to seek immediate medical care:

Call your doctor if prolonged coughing spells cause you or your child to:

Vomit
Turn red or blue
Inhale with a whooping sound

Michael Sommermeyer
Court Information Officer
SommermeyerM@clarkcountycourts.us
Sounds lovely. Just as an aside, you should probably give your doctor a ring if you turn blue, regardless of whether you've recently been in the RJC.

Think visiting the RJC will prevent attorneys from being able to donate blood?

(Thanks Tipster!)

Tuesday, July 20, 2010

RJC Snitches Get Stitches

Apparently, the higher-ups didn't appreciate the RJ's recent article concerning flaws with the RJC security camera system. So, what's a whistleblower to do when the passive-aggressive emails start flying? Send the emails to the RJ, of course.

It all started when Chief District Judge T. Arthur Ritchie Jr. "chastised" Judge Susan Johnson - who chairs the courthouse security committee - for talking to the RJ about the camera issue:
"I assume you meant well, but you were specifically told that you were not authorized to address this issue for the court," Ritchie wrote. "I am disappointed that you would take it upon yourself to address this issue in this way. ... We will see whether your approach makes this better or worse for the court."
Uh oh. Chief Ritchie is "disappointed," but SJ wasn't about to take Ritchie's little lecture lying down:
Johnson responded that, "You never informed me I was not authorized to address this issue for the court. Your response was ... that you would 'handle this,' which you did not do. Further, while I respect your role as chief judge, you have no authority to instruct me or any district judge that he or she cannot speak to the media without your consent."
Snap! Beautiful and feisty - how bout them apples, Chief?

Next, Chief Justice of the Peace Ann Zimmerman jumped into the "Reply All" pool to defend her fellow Chief:
"I believe that your interview further compromised security at the RJC by exposing potential weaknesses to those who may wish to do harm to our judges and/or the public at the RJC," Zimmerman wrote [to Johnson]. "I believe you had good intentions, but the outcome is otherwise."
"[T]he outcome is otherwise?" That can't be right, can it?

Judge Doug Smith then decided to go ALL CAPS on everyone's ass:
"In the future, please do not disclose our safety to the newspapers. I don't feel comfortable with that disclosure."

When one judge [taking bets on who] responded with a simple "?", Smith wrote back in capital letters: "THIS IS IN REGARDS TO THE NEWSPAPER PERSON ALLOWED INTO OUR BACK OFFICES AND THE BAD PRESS WE RECEIVED. WHO APPROVED THE RELEASE(?)"
CALM DOWN DOUG. THE PUBLIC CLEARLY COULDN'T CARE LESS ABOUT JUDICIAL ELECTIONS - ANY PRESS IS YOUR FRIEND.

Judge Cadish also had some thoughts:
"I too was extremely disturbed to read in the paper about exactly what cameras around the courthouse don't have the view they should have because they're blocked by trees or otherwise out of position. I do think it can easily put us at risk."
By "us," Cadish of course meant all the employees and visitors in the RJC, right? She wasn't just talking about the robed ones who already have private security guards ... right?

SJ defended herself by noting that by speaking to the RJ she "in fact, made the story less negative than it would have been."

We look forward to the next email thread from the judges explaining how organizing a witch hunt instead of just fixing the security problem made the story more positive.

(LVRJ; Thanks Tipsters!)

Wednesday, July 7, 2010

How To Avoid The RJC Security Cameras

The RJ published an article yesterday which claims "officials" have known about "flaws" in the RJC security camera system for more than six months, and have done little to fix the problem. From the article:
The Review-Journal saw camera obstructions outside firsthand from the 17-story courthouse's main control room operated by marshals.

As the marshals remotely panned two separate cameras mounted near the main entrance on the north side of the building, palm trees and other trees clearly were blocking several camera angles.
Just in case you had some wild delusion that you were safe inside the courthouse, the RJ went ahead and gave some fairly specific secret entry points for the RJC:
Cameras posted above a covered parking lot for judges across the street from the south side of the building encountered obstructions from the metal rooftops, making it nearly impossible, for the most part, to see anyone going in and out of their cars.

When the cameras were panned to a walkway leading to a private courthouse entrance, it was clear that the cameras would have a difficult time picking up anyone hiding in tall bushes near the walkway.
Just remember that the next time you get frustrated waiting with the great unwashed at the northern entrance metal detectors ... you are just a metal rooftop and some tall bushes away from the VIP entrance, Mr. Bond.

(LVRJ; Thanks, Tipster!)

Monday, June 28, 2010

Marshal Law

There seems to be a little conflict brewing at the RJC between the marshals who man the security checkpoints and the marshals in charge of keeping the judges and courtrooms safe. Apparently, while both are paid equally, the judicial marshals get some extra perks.

From LV Legal News:
In recent months, according to marshals who work for the administration, as many as a dozen of the roughly 40 marshals assigned to judges and justices of the peace have gotten into the habit of leaving well before their daily shifts end. This usually occurs after the jurists shut down their courtrooms for the day.
Maybe we can get the judicial marshals to open up the south entrance after their judges leave for the day. Win-win!

(LV Legal News; Thanks Tipster!)

Friday, February 12, 2010

Secret Security Breach at the RJC

LV Now is reporting (via current Boyd student Colleen McCarty) that after the January 4th federal courthouse shooting began, a crowd of people in the lobby of the RJC pushed their way past the metal detectors without being screened:
Neither Glasper [head of RJC security] nor Clark County Courts Spokesman Michael Sommermeyer discussed the events of January 4th in detail. But, sources tell the I-Team a panicked public, fleeing the sound of gunfire, pushed past the metal detectors at the Regional Justice Center and into the lower level. The security breach was one reason authorities shut down the building. "We took the necessary precautions to protect the public," Glasper said.
It's well known that security at the RJC is under-funded and, as a result, under-staffed. That's been the reason given for the closing of the south entrance. However, what really caught our eye about the LV Now story was Clark County Courts Security Chief Lt. George Glasper's estimate of how many people they actually catch attempting to smuggle weapons into the courthouse:
"We do have probably 10 percent of the folks who are coming in who are actually trying to smuggle a weapon in to do harm."
Ten percent?! As in one in ten people who go through security at the RJC are in possession of a weapon? If that number is even remotely accurate judges, attorneys and court personnel should be absolutely outraged.

While we commend the job that the current security officers are doing, it is inexcusable for the RJC to be under-staffed with a threat level that is so ridiculously high. It's time for the county to step up and take security at the RJC seriously before we have another tragic incident occur.

We'd like to hear your thoughts and comments on this situation. Were any of you in the building when the breach occurred on January 4th? What do you think needs to be done in order to improve this situation? We know the powers-that-be are reading ... let them know how you feel.

Monday, March 23, 2009

Can we just go back to using the old courthouse?

For those of you new to the area, here's a newsflash: the RJC is falling apart. Between the horrendous elevator situation and the sewer problem that is still being addressed, the building has had issues since being "completed" in 2005 (3 years behind schedule).

Another "issue" reared its head last Wednesday when a leak on the 3rd floor caused courthouse personnel to turn off the water to the building on floors 3 through 17. This, in turn, caused some problems with the bathrooms on those floors, from the LV Sun:
Jurors in trials on the upper floors looking for a bathroom break, for example, had to travel down to the lower levels. On some of the higher floors, people ignored the closed-bathroom signs and used them anyway, clogging up toilets.
Lovely. Screw higher education, let's find some money in the budget to give those janitors a raise.