Monday, March 15, 2010
Meet the Candidates: Department 27
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Meet the Candidates: Department S
1.Why do you want to be a judge?
My temperament and philosophy are well suited to the Family Court bench. I believe the Family Court needs judges who will listen to litigants and their attorneys. A judge should not jump to conclusions about factual issues before the parties or attorneys have a chance to open their mouths. Bearing in mind time constraints the Court faces due to its caseload, a judge should advise the litigants of any questions or issues from the pleadings he is particularly interested in hearing, then afford each litigant time for a short initial presentation of his or her case before making rulings. However, I also believe that when litigants fail to file timely proper pleadings, and no extension has been requested, the hearing date should be vacated where appropriate, and the relief sought by the other party should be summarily granted.
2. Why are you qualified to be a judge?
I have many years of experience adjudicating fee disputes for the Nevada State Bar. I have spent the majority of my legal career helping individuals litigate child custody, divorce, child support, and related matters, and understand the area of law from a practitioner’s viewpoint. I believe this will allow me to bring common sense and practicality to the bench. I also have a reputation for being fair and honest, which I believe is of paramount importance in a judge.
3. Do you read Wild Wild Law? If so, what do you think of the site?
I only recently became aware of the website and found it very informative and interesting.
I am the first private attorney in the State of Nevada to identify that there is a huge disparity between how the private Family Law Bar and the Family Support Division of the District Attorney's Office, calculates child support penalties. I identified this disparity at the Trial Court level and prevailed, saving my client more than $42,000.00. The issue is currently up on Appeal. The Court's ruling is anticipated to affect tens of thousands of non custodial parents owing child support.
I listen carefully and weigh the evidence before making rulings as an Alternate Child Support/Paternity Hearing Master (March 2002 to present) and Guardianship Hearing Master (April 2006 to present). I was a former Alternate Domestic Violence Commissioner (April 2006 to March 2009).
I am an active member of the State Bar of Nevada Fee Dispute Committee and am regularly assigned mediations and arbitrations.
I juggle married life, parenting, working, running my own business and community service. I do high quality work at middle class rates.
I am able to make "no nonsense decisions" and efficiently run an organized calendar. Very few of my decisions are objected to because I take the time to explain my decisions and rationale.
Top 3 Priorities if elected: 1) Giving everyone “his or her day in court” and a “fair shake,” 2) working hard and smart to improve the quality of justice for Clark County Residents, and 3) Insuring enforcement of existing court orders.
3) Do you read Wild Wild Law? If so, what do you think of the site?
I do read Wild Wild Law. I came across it after Goggling Judge Cheryl Moss' name. I foolishly ran against Judge Cheryl Moss in the 2008 Election. I say "foolish" because I learned that, as a general rule, it is a bad idea to run against an incumbent. Overall, I must like the Wild Wild Law Website because I take the time to read it once or twice a week.
1. Why do you want to be a judge?
I believe, based on my thirty years of legal experience, my prior services and my temperament, that I am ready to serve as a productive member of the judiciary. I have stood on the sideline while individuals without experience or ability were elected to District Court. These individuals have caused injury to the judiciary, the
legal profession and the citizens that have appeared in their court.
My prior service as a law clerk for a District Judge as alternative Hearing Master for juvenile court, truancy court and alternative Domestic Violence commissioner have provided me an excellent legal preparation for the position of Family Court Judge. In addition, I have prior service as a Deputy Attorney General representing the citizens of
My judicial experience includes serving as alternative Judge in North Las Vegas Municipal Court and arbitrator for the District Court. I was elected to the State Bar Board of Governor in 2009.
These positions represent my experience and, just as important, that I have been called to serve because others have trusted my ability and judgment. Recently, the State Judicial Selection Committee selected me twice for consideration for appointment to openings on Family court and the county selection committee selected me as one of five finalists for two Justice of the Peace positions
Rebecca Wallace - No Response Received
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
Meet the Candidates: Department F
John Eccles
Campaign Website: http://www.john4judge.com/

1. Why do you want to be a judge?
Unlike many people I know who have aspired to the judiciary for as long as they can remember, it was numerous conversations I have had over the past two to three years with members of the Family Law Bar and Family Law Judges which steered me toward the decision to run for Family Court judge. My colleagues have suggested to me that my experience and demeanor in Family Court have provided me with the breadth of knowledge and attitude necessary to be not just a Family Court judge, but an effective Family Court judge.
2. Why are you qualified to be a judge?
While in law school, I made sure nearly every elective I chose was in some way tied to Family Law. I knew before I graduated that Family Law would be my principal area of practice. Because of a then existing quirky rule, I was able to take - and pass - the Nevada Bar before graduating from law school. Since then, around 85% of my time as an attorney has been spent in Family Law, navigating clients through the Family Court, expanding my knowledge of Family Law along the way. Though many attorneys are loathe to handle Family Law matters, I thoroughly enjoy it. I receive a terrific level of satisfaction in getting clients through the pitfalls and quagmires often associated with Family Law cases. I respectfully submit my training and experience in Family Law, as well as my demeanor, will serve the people of Clark County well once I am elected. For me, Family Court judge is a destination, and one where I believe I will be able to guide the greatest number of litigants through the rigors of Family Law in a fair, efficient and timely manner.
3. Do you read Wild Wild Law? If so, what do you think of the site?
Shortly before receiving the invitation to submit my responses, a friend of mine told me about Wild Wild Law. Not being familiar with this blog, I checked it out, and was depth and breadth of information (and gossip) relative to the practice of law here in Clark County. I have it on my favorites now!
Bill Gonzalez - No response received
Monday, March 8, 2010
Meet the Candidates: Department C
Maria Maskall - No response received
Denise A. Pifer
Campaign Website: denisepiferforjudge.com

Thursday, March 4, 2010
Meet the Candidates: Department 31
About eight years ago I applied for and was appointed as a Pro Tem Judge in Las Vegas Justice Court. I have served there for many of the judges when they are away for training or on vacation or sick leave. The staff members of the judges I serve for have complimented my ability to handle the case load and make appropriate and fair decisions, and they continue to call on me to serve.
Joanna Kishner
Campaign Website: http://www.joannakishner.com

2. Why are you qualified to be a judge?
To be a member of the judiciary, an attorney should not only have a breadth and depth of experience and be well regarded among the current judiciary and his/her peers but also the individual has to have demonstrated that she is intelligent, fair, and has integrity. She should also have a record of public service. I believe that I have all of these qualifications.
In addition to my legal practice, I have judicial experience. I have had the honor of working in our court systems as a Justice of the Peace Pro Tem, a Pro Tem Small Claims Referee, a Pro Tem Traffic Court Referee and as an Arbitrator for a number of years. In these roles I have handled a wide variety of civil and criminal matters involving both pro se litigants and those represented by counsel. These real life experiences have helped me hone my skills so that I will be a dedicated and capable member of the judiciary. I know what it takes to run an efficient and effective courtroom where not only are the needs of the litigants met but also those of the attorneys and the community at large.
My commitment to the Southern Nevada community and public service is unparalleled. Since I was a youth in Las Vegas, I have contributed my time, skills and resources to help numerous charitable and non-profit organizations. I have continued this commitment throughout my legal practice by donating significant time and resources to various pro bono projects including working with abused and neglected children and others less fortunate in Clark County. I also donate my time to various schools in Southern Nevada.
3. Do you read Wild Wild Law? If so, what do you think of the site?
I have enjoyed the opportunity to view Wild Wild Law on a variety of occasions since it is witty yet informative regarding issues in the legal community.
Josh Kunis - No response received
Marc Risman
After practicing law for 31 in Clark County, I look forward to the challenges that I would face as a judge. I remember, when I first started practicing, being mentored by Judges like Bob Legakes and Del Guy. It made me a better lawyer, and I would like to be able to do the same with today's new lawyers. After a case is concluded, I would make myself available to discuss the lawyers' presentation and offer any constructive criticism, or praise, that was warranted. This would also allow me to get feedback on my practices on the bench.
After practicing law for 31 years in Clark County and appearing before several generations of judges here, I have the experience and temperament to make the right decisions while treating everybody who comes into the courtroom with respect. My clients have included some of the most accomplished names in sports and entertainment and business. These people could have afforded to use any attorney they wanted and I am humbled, yet proud, that they hired me. This is a testament to my legal abilities and work ethic. I have also made my services available to small businesses and hard working people who could not afford to pay my standard fee rate. I have served in leadership positions of several bar organizations and committees, had several legal articles published, and lectured at bar meetings and seminars. I have served on the board of many community and charity groups. Details of these activities can be found on my practice website: www.calneva-law.com
Yes, I appreciate the information and insight posted on the site and appreciate the efforts of those who contribute regularly. As a judge, I would like to contribute on a regular basis.
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Meet the Candidates: Department 30
1. Why do you want to be a judge?
I want to be a District Judge because that's where I can make the most significant contribution to the profession and the community I've invested in since 1978. Like you, I want a judiciary that reflects the best legal talent, mature judgment, fairness and ethics available.
2. Why are you qualified to be a judge?
I am an honors graduate of the U. of Arizona law school where I was Executive Editor of the Arizona Law Review. For over 20 years, I was a successful "AV" rated litigator in private practice handling criminal, civil, family and probate matters. I am admitted to practice in all state and federal courts, including the United States Supreme Court. My partner Stew Bell asked me to come to the D.A.'s office to run the Civil and Familly Support divisions and to do Coroner's Inquests and Death Penalty assessments, which I did for 5 years. Since then, I have been the Chief Deputy City Attorney, Criminal, for North Las Vegas. I have served as a Nevada Supreme Court Settlement Judge, Juvenile Hearing Master Pro-Tem, and Small Claims Referee. Paying it forward is important to me, so I sit on numerous Boards relating to education and kids. My colleagues honored me as a State Bar Governor. Please take a moment to view my web site at DavidsonForJudge.com for a complete resume of my professional and community leadership positions and awards. The depth and breadth of my experiences as a trial lawyer, jurist, business owner and community leader have honed the judgment that qualifies me to sit on the District Court bench.
3. Do you read Wild Wild Law? If so, what do you think of the site?
I view Wild Wild Law with the same sense of guilty pleasure I got from watching "Boston Legal". There's always a thread of serious concerns interwoven with legal mayhem, highlighted by an occasional flash of psychosis.
Craig Friedberg
Campaign website: www.FriedbergForJudge.com

1. Why do you want to be a judge?
First and foremost, I want to give back to a community that has enabled my family and me to prosper. I understand that making a living in a community creates an obligation to make that community better for everyone. I wish to fulfill that responsibility by working to improve our court system, from the inside.
Our court system is in a precarious position. I have heard many people, lawyers and lay persons alike, speak of it with disgust because they think it is a rigged institution. People want and deserve to be treated with decency and respect. In the courtroom, that principle applies with special force. At stake is the public’s confidence in our system of justice. When a judge does not allow a party or their attorney to present their argument, or when a judge’s intemperance leads them to rule out of spite or anger contrary to the law, the judge undercuts not just the affected person’s confidence in the outcome of their case, but it damages the public’s trust in our overall system of justice.
Justice is not about politics. It should not be about favors, back room deals, or personal ambition. Justice is about doing what is right. It is about following and respecting the law, protecting the rights of all litigants, and ensuring that our community is the safest and fairest it can be. I have a passion for seeing that kind of justice done, and becoming a judge will provide me the opportunity to demonstrate that our judicial system can be one that protects all people's rights and gives them a fair hearing. I want everyone that walks out of my courtroom to feel as though they were given the opportunity to be heard. I also want to do what I can to lower the costs of litigation.
I have several ideas I will implement to obtain these goals:
1) Institute a tentative ruling system (to keep arguments focused and keep hearings short, thus keeping the calendar moving at a crisper pace and cut down on the time attorneys and/or parties are waiting around for their cases to be called);
2) Have staggered start times for hearings (also to lessen the amount of time parties and attorneys must wait);
3) Encourage court appearances to be made by telephone or video, where appropriate (this will, like the above steps, lessen litigation costs);
4) Require that all parties adhere to the N.R.C.P. and Local Rules (to keep a level playing field);
5) Provide a briefing schedule when granting an order shortening time (less a cost saving procedure, than addressing a pet peeve of mine);
6) Make sure the necessary research on an issue is done before the hearing (eliminating the perception the judge is ruling by the “seat of his/her pants” or is relying on the reputation of the party or its attorney rather than the substance of the argument);
7) Institute early status conferences on the cases that will come from other departments (to find out whether there is any common ground on which a resolution can be built, rather than have them languishing for years in the system);.
8) Make myself and my courtroom available for settlement conferences and hearing overflows; and .
9) Work to develop and expand specialty courts, such as our business court, drug court, and the soon to be implemented veterans treatment court (such as a consumer fraud/deceptive trade practices docket).
2. Why are you qualified to be a judge?
Instead of regurgitating my resume (which can be found on my website, www.FriedbergForJudge.com), I would rather tell you a little about my family and me. I am a husband to Lauriann (former EMT-I and current Nutritional Therapist) and father to Ian, Nicole and Joshua. My family and I have resided in Las Vegas for over 20 years. My children have grown up here and attended both public and private schools in Clark County. My family and I are involved in the community on many levels. We are bicycle riders and we have used that activity to raise money to fight MS and my wife and younger children are HAM Radio Operators and are CERT (Citizen Emergency Response Team) trained and qualified. We also volunteer to help out our neighborhood churches and synagogues.
I have been teaching Sunday School for more than 10 years, primarily teaching ethics to young people, and I enjoy helping out wherever my vast experience is needed, from providing many hours of pro bono direction to lay persons and colleagues regarding consumer rights issues, to assisting our high school and college students by regularly serving as a presiding judge at mock trial competitions. I was also an elected member of the board of trustees of a multi-million dollar non-profit for 6 years.
As for my legal credentials to be a judge, I have extensive judicial and quasi-judicial experience. I am currently a Short Trial Judge for the District Court, a Justice Court Pro Tem, I will be beginning my term shortly as a Clark County Hearing Officer and I have been an Arbitrator deciding civil matters for more than 15 years and over 150 arbitrations.
I have been a civil/commercial/
I believe a good judge must be unbiased, smart, hard-working, a good researcher and writer, considerate and conscientious of those that appear in his courtroom; and someone who does not forget that it’s the people and businesses of Clark County that pay his salary, and it is his obligation to ensure that every party before him is provided a level playing field. I have been told I embrace all of these qualities. Additionally, I am the one with concrete proposals and ideas to make our court system fairer and more affordable. My extensive civil experience and character are what will allow me to “hit the ground running,” as soon as I am seated, as Department 30, by legislative decree, will have a civil docket.
Treating people with decency and respect is a hallmark of my leadership and my legal career. When it comes to applying our laws, I stand for firm fairness. I will honor the oath of office to uphold the Constitution and laws of the United States and the State of Nevada. I will consider each case before me based on the facts presented and the applicable law. Doing so consistently, in every case or controversy that is presented in my court, is the only way a Judge can hope to achieve the fairness that our legal system was designed to produce.
3. Do you read Wild Wild Law? If so, what do you think of the site?
Until recently. I had not been aware of the site. But once I found it and started reading (and commenting on) the very interesting and provocative articles, it has become a regular part of my daily web surfing. I only wish I had known about the site sooner, as I am sure I have missed some wonderful commentary and responses over the years.
Patricia "Trish" Palm
Campaign website: http://www.patriciapalm.com

1. Why do you want to be a judge?
Finally, I have the right temperament. I am generally thoughtful, courteous and cordial. I have also been endorsed by SEIU Local 1107.
3. Do you read Wild Wild Law? If so, what do you think of the site?
I read the site when I have the time, and I like it. It’s a good place to go for information and entertainment.
Jerry A. Wiese
Campaign Website: jerrywieseforjudge.com
I have determined that instead of providing legal services to individuals, I would like to use my experience, training, and expertise to benefit the people of Clark County as a whole. My wife is a 2nd grade teacher and I have seen how she is able to change the lives of children, and make the world a better place, by providing an education to each child. I believe that as a District Court Judge, as I make correct rulings on legal cases, I will be able to make a difference in our community, and make it a little bit better place. My goal is to make sure that the citizens of Clark County have access to a fair and impartial judicial system, with judges who have the qualifications, knowledge, and experience to make unbiased and correct rulings.
2. Why are you qualified to be a judge?
I am the most qualified candidate for District Court Judge in Department 30, based primarily upon my experience. I am regarded highly and respected by my peers, who are civil trial attorneys. This is evidenced by my extensive list of supporters, as seen on my website. The seven new District Court seats, including Department 30, are all designated as "civil law" departments. This means that the Judge elected to Department 30, will be ruling on cases involving personal injuries, medical malpractice, workers compensation, contract disputes, collection law, construction law, etc. For the past 15+ years, I have been a civil trial attorney, practicing in these same areas. I am the only candidate for District Court Department 30, who can make that statement. I am the only candidate for Department 30, who has had a varied practice, involving various aspects of civil law. I am the only candidate for this department who has participated as an attorney in civil jury trials for the past 15 years. If I were a "criminal attorney," I would not be qualified for this seat. If I had a history in civil law, but had practiced in the area of criminal law for the past 10 years, I would not be qualified for this seat. Fortunately, I have practiced almost exclusively in civil law, for the past 15 years. Consequently, I believe that I am the most qualified candidate for Department 30. Additionally, I have served for many years as a Pro Tem Justice of the Peace, so I have experience sitting as a Judge and making rulings as a Judge. I have acted as an arbitrator in more than 150 cases, as a Court-Appointed Arbitrator, and have made rulings and decisions in each of those cases. I grew up in Las Vegas - I have been here for the past 40 years. I graduated from Rancho High School, and I understand the needs, problems, and concerns of the people of Clark County. This community has been good to me, has helped me to make a comfortable living as a trial attorney, and it has provided various services for myself and my family. I now want to have the chance to give something back.
3. Do you read Wild Wild Law? If so, what do you think of the site?
Until I received an e-mail requesting information about my candidacy, I was not aware of the Wild Wild Law website. Consequently, I cannot offer an opinion about the site. I will try to visit this website more in the future, so that I can become acquainted with it and its postings. I do appreciate the opportunity to provide information about my candidacy, and request the support of Wild Wild Law.
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
Meet the Candidates: Department 28

1. Why do you want to be a judge?
I want to be a District Court Judge in the newly-created Department 28 because I bring not only experience and a record of public service, but a commitment to the hard work it takes to be fair and effective. A judge owes the parties in a case or controversy the diligence and preparation necessary to render a ruling grounded in a thorough understanding of the facts and the applicable law. These new departments have been created to help with the ever-growing civil caseload and the citizens of Clark County deserve judges that will work hard. I will be that kind of judge.
2. Why are you qualified to be a judge?
At present, I am a Chief Deputy District Attorney with the Clark County District Attorney’s Office. I have been a lawyer with the office for 16 years, beginning in the Appellate Division. I was then a prosecutor in the Criminal Division where I handled misdemeanor and felony cases and tried cases to juries in District Court. I then moved to the Civil Division where I have primarily handled the defense of Clark County and its various entities in civil litigation for the past 11 years. I have also participated in administrative hearings and I advise the District Attorney’s Office and District Court Administration on matters of policy and procedure and contracts. Additionally, I have represented the County, the District Attorney’s Office, LVMPD and individually-named officers in civil rights litigation in Federal District Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
As a Deputy District Attorney for 16 years, I have demonstrated a commitment to public service. I have a broad range of experience practicing in both civil and criminal law and in both State and Federal Court. There is simply no substitute for hands-on experience. My qualifications go beyond that, however, because I would bring to my job as judge a genuine commitment to the citizens of Clark County to prepare diligently in order to run a fair, effective and efficient courtroom.
3. Do you read Wild Wild Law and if so, what do you think of the site?
I just recently began reading Wild Wild Law and I find it really informative. What a brilliant idea – a place where those in the legal profession can “meet” and trade tidbits about significant happenings. I will definitely stay tuned.
Jack Howard - No response received
Ron Israel
2. I have practiced primarily civil law for the majority of my career in Clark County. I have handled all types of civil cases. I am a Court Appointed Arbitrator, as well as a Judge Pro Tem in the short trial program.
3. I have not read Wild Wild Law.
Monday, March 1, 2010
Meet the Candidates: Department 26
Kurt Kay Harris

1. Why do you want to be a judge?
With my experience and demeanor, I believe that I am well suited to make effective decisions based upon the specific facts of any individual case, while applying the law. I strongly believe in the Constitution and reject judicial activism. I do not think that a judge should take part in the adversarial process. Attorneys are there and that is their job. In Department 26, I would listen to the arguments, consider the pleadings, apply the law to the facts and make decisions based upon that criteria.
I have witnessed first-hand, the benefits the public receives from a just judiciary and wish to make efforts to streamline the process, uphold the constitution, reduce costs to the public as well as treating all with courtesy and respect. I would expedite hearings and come to court prepared. Making well-reasoned decisions, based upon the law, reduces future litigation. I would also like to increase the access to the justice system by litigants who are unrepresented and give priority to pro bono attorneys.
I would also like to give priority to cases where witnesses, especially law enforcement, are subpoenaed to appear. We should get these representatives back on the streets keeping us safe. I think we should explore night court and/or bilingual court sessions as methods of saving tax dollars.
2. Why are you qualified to be a judge?
I have been an attorney for more than 15 years and I have a strong desire to take that experience and serve the Eighth Judicial District in Department 26. After graduating from law school, I clerked for some excellent judicial examples, which instilled the judicial desire. Having served behind the scenes and spending a lot of time in our courtrooms on a variety of topics, I am familiar with the process and understand the Rules of Civil Procedure. I have represented a lot of individuals and am desirous to take my experience and put it to work in the Court. Some of my best experiences in trial were when the Judge was rarely heard, the testimony and evidence were presented and a decision or verdict was rendered. No one likes a referee at a contest to decide the outcome of the game. In jury trials, I would not decide the contest, that is the call of the jury.
I have managed a significant amount of cases as an arbitrator. I have additionally tried many jury cases to verdict. I have tried many, many bench trials. However, I also believe I am qualified to mediate when called upon and to explore creative methods of alternative dispute resolution.
Having practiced in our courtrooms, I have the experience necessary to understand what attorneys and litigants face. I understand the difficulty of trial work and would be compassionate and accommodating for witnesses and the scheduling of their testimonies during trial. The Rules can be enforced while maintaining flexibility. I also have found myself arguing a position with a judge in some forums which I do not believe is prudent. The Court is not an advocate and should be the finder of fact and/or the Court should apply the law.
3. Do you read Wild Wild Law? If so, what do you think of the site?
Yes, I read Wild Wild Law. I think the site is informative and gives important and relevant information to the legal community on a local level. Prior to receiving your invitation to respond, I listed your blog on my website, http://www.702judge.com/ as an interesting link. I cannot say I agree with everything posted, however, the information is helpful and your resource may be the only source attorney’s have to consider.
Gloria Sturman
1. Why do you want to be a judge?
Through my experience as a pro tem judge, both in Justice Court and the Short Trial Program, I have come to believe that not only would I find serving as a District Court Judge personally rewarding, but that as a District Court Judge I can make a positive impact on the community that I have called home for 27 years. My years in practice in
2. Why are you qualified to be a judge?
The purpose in adding seven new District Court seats is to provide courts dedicated to trying civil lawsuits. I believe that my 27 year career as civil litigator has provided an excellent basis to serve as a civil trial judge. I have tried a number of cases to verdict before a jury in both state and federal court (my best estimate is 20 cases). These matters include personal injury, employment, construction, and contract matters. I have also tried a number of non jury cases to verdict. In addition, I have had the opportunity to obtain judicial experience. I served as an arbitrator in the Clark County Court Annexed Arbitration program from the inception of the program until 2002. I have also served as a private arbitrator upon request of the parties. I have served as a Short Trial Judge pro tem since 2005, presiding over several jury trials, as well as non jury trials. I was appointed Justice of the Peace pro tem by the Clark County Commission in 2004 and reappointed in 2006 and 2008. As a Justice of the Peace pro tem I have presided over preliminary proceedings in criminal matters, civil matters including bench trials, and misdemeanor traffic court proceedings. In addition to representing both plaintiffs and defendants in a variety of legal proceedings, and presiding as a judge, I have served as a juror. I believe the breadth of my experience in these roles has provided me with the knowledge to run an efficient courtroom, thus meeting the needs of the litigants, their attorneys, and the tax payers. I believe this breadth of experience also has prepared me to "hit the ground running" by that I mean I believe I have the knowledge and expertise to immediately handle a variety of civil cases, both at trial and on motion practice. I also believe that I have earned the respect of my peers in the legal community, as demonstrated by having been elected to serve in leadership roles in many professional and community organizations including as president of State Bar of Nevada. This is further demonstrated by my having received the A-V rating from my peers in the community through Martindale-Hubbell.
3. Do you read Wild Wild Law? If so, what do you think of the site?
No