Thursday, March 4, 2010

Meet the Candidates: Department 31

Phil Dabney

1. Why do you want to be a judge?

I was a law clerk for Earle W. White, Jr., from 1987 to 1988. I saw first hand how a trial court judge can impact the lives of those who are before the Court. Judge White gave me significant responsibilities as a law clerk, and I enjoyed being involved in the role of decision making in the litigation process. I found the job to be intellectually stimulating and gratifying. I decided from that experience to develop skills that would eventually qualify me to be a trial judge. I also wanted my development to help me determine if I had the right temperament and attitude to be a good judge.

2. Why are you qualified to be a judge?

I became qualified to be a judge through the development process that I started after being a law clerk for Judge White. I have spent about 23 years as a civil litigator with a concentration on commercial and construction litigation of all varieties. I also have litigated personal injury cases on behalf of plaintiffs and defendants. I have earned the peer review distinction of an AV rating with Martindale Hubbell as a result of my successful practice.
About 15 years ago I became trained as an arbitrator for commercial and construction disputes with the American Arbitration Association and for court-mandated arbitrations. I have presided over many arbitrations and written my own decisions on all cases

About eight years ago I applied for and was appointed as a Pro Tem Judge in Las Vegas Justice Court. I have served there for many of the judges when they are away for training or on vacation or sick leave. The staff members of the judges I serve for have complimented my ability to handle the case load and make appropriate and fair decisions, and they continue to call on me to serve.

I also applied for and became a Short Trial Judge in the District Court's award-winning program about eight years ago, when the program was formed. In that program, I preside over cases where the damages are $50,000 or less and the dispute can be tried in a single day. I've been assigned to dozens of cases over eight years, and about 20 have gone to trial. About half of those trials were decided by a jury, and the rest were decided in a bench trial with me acting as the finder of fact. In those cases, I wrote my own Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, a practice I would continue if elected to the bench.

Those three experiences -- 23 years as a litigator in civil disputes; fifteen years as a successful arbitrator; and eight years as a successful appointed judge -- uniquely qualify me for Department 31 in a way that sets me apart from my able opponents.

Since becoming a candidate, I have participated in a number of interviews for endorsements by community groups. I recently learned that the Las Vegas Metro Police Protective Association endorsed my candidacy for Department 31 of District Court. Other endorsements have not been announced to my knowledge, as of the date of this email.

3. Do you read Wild Wild Law? If so, what do you think of the site?

I had not read this site until I received your invitation. It contains some interesting and lively material. Blogging is becoming quite popular and serves a useful purpose. I wish the authors much success.


Joanna Kishner
Campaign Website:
http://www.joannakishner.com



1. Why do you want to be a judge?
My family and the Southern Nevada community where I was born are of paramount importance to me. Although I have had the privilege to contribute to the community in many ways throughout my life, including through my charitable endeavors and by serving as a Pro Tem Justice of the Peace, Pro Tem Small Claims Referee, Traffic Court Referee and Arbitrator, I believe that I can best serve Clark County, if I apply my proven skills, experience, and hard work ethic on a full time basis as a public servant. As a Judge, I will ensure that each individual who appears before me is treated with respect, that each case is handled in a manner where the pleadings are fully read and understood, and that in every case, the law is applied correctly and fairly. My breadth and depth of legal experience combined with my dedication to the community and ethical practices will not only allow me to serve the judiciary honorably, but will also allow me to have a positive impact on the community.

2. Why are you qualified to be a judge?

To be a member of the judiciary, an attorney should not only have a breadth and depth of experience and be well regarded among the current judiciary and his/her peers but also the individual has to have demonstrated that she is intelligent, fair, and has integrity. She should also have a record of public service. I believe that I have all of these qualifications.
Since graduating from UCLA School of Law, over twenty years ago, I have litigated, mediated and arbitrated a wide range of cases including complex litigation matters and class actions in various state and federal courts as well as other forums. Given my cases have encompassed not only the state and federal court systems but also administrative forums and alternative dispute arenas, I am able to understand and find creative solutions to try and resolve various cases effectively. As a result of my efforts, I have been recognized by several publications for my legal work including Chambers, Super Lawyers and Best Lawyers. Importantly, my colleagues including those whom I have litigated against and community leaders also have expressed their confidence in my abilities to serve as a Judge. Please see my website at www.JoannaKishner.com for a partial listing of my supporters.

In addition to my legal practice, I have judicial experience. I have had the honor of working in our court systems as a Justice of the Peace Pro Tem, a Pro Tem Small Claims Referee, a Pro Tem Traffic Court Referee and as an Arbitrator for a number of years. In these roles I have handled a wide variety of civil and criminal matters involving both pro se litigants and those represented by counsel. These real life experiences have helped me hone my skills so that I will be a dedicated and capable member of the judiciary. I know what it takes to run an efficient and effective courtroom where not only are the needs of the litigants met but also those of the attorneys and the community at large.

My commitment to the Southern Nevada community and public service is unparalleled. Since I was a youth in Las Vegas, I have contributed my time, skills and resources to help numerous charitable and non-profit organizations. I have continued this commitment throughout my legal practice by donating significant time and resources to various pro bono projects including working with abused and neglected children and others less fortunate in Clark County. I also donate my time to various schools in Southern Nevada.

3. Do you read Wild Wild Law? If so, what do you think of the site?


I have enjoyed the opportunity to view Wild Wild Law on a variety of occasions since it is witty yet informative regarding issues in the legal community.


Josh Kunis - No response received

Marc Risman

1. Why do you want to be a judge?

After practicing law for 31 in Clark County, I look forward to the challenges that I would face as a judge. I remember, when I first started practicing, being mentored by Judges like Bob Legakes and Del Guy. It made me a better lawyer, and I would like to be able to do the same with today's new lawyers. After a case is concluded, I would make myself available to discuss the lawyers' presentation and offer any constructive criticism, or praise, that was warranted. This would also allow me to get feedback on my practices on the bench.

2. Why are you qualified to be a judge?

After practicing law for 31 years in Clark County and appearing before several generations of judges here, I have the experience and temperament to make the right decisions while treating everybody who comes into the courtroom with respect. My clients have included some of the most accomplished names in sports and entertainment and business. These people could have afforded to use any attorney they wanted and I am humbled, yet proud, that they hired me. This is a testament to my legal abilities and work ethic. I have also made my services available to small businesses and hard working people who could not afford to pay my standard fee rate. I have served in leadership positions of several bar organizations and committees, had several legal articles published, and lectured at bar meetings and seminars. I have served on the board of many community and charity groups. Details of these activities can be found on my practice website: www.calneva-law.com

3. Do you read Wild Wild Law? If so, what do you think of the site?

Yes, I appreciate the information and insight posted on the site and appreciate the efforts of those who contribute regularly. As a judge, I would like to contribute on a regular basis.

19 comments:

  1. Phil Dabney is the worst Pro Tem. He lets more criminals out of custody than Michael Cherry ever did. Truly bad for public safety.

    ReplyDelete
  2. but if we don't let them out, they can't commit more crime. then there would be no justification for the huge DA/PD, CCSO, LVPD and Court budgets. By being a revolving door, we are simply helping keep thousands of otherwise unemployable idiots in the work force.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I love when candidates slip in the fact that they were born in Nevada. The 95% of us who weren't don't effing care.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Soooooo, a candidate thinks that they would let a judge post here regularly. Then again, it took a lot for Lizzy to get off of the bench.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Rumor is Dept 25 trial jury verdict in: $13M+.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Kisnher = Halverson 2.0

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'm a fairly new attorney and have a case against Marc Risman. I've had a favorable view of him since the case began and was glad to see him running for judge. From what I've seen, he's sharp and ethical. Of these candidates, my vote so far is for Risman. That said, I have no personal knowledge about the other candidates.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I don't do Criminal Law but I've had Mr. Dabney on more than one occassion as a Short Trial Judge and as an Arbitrator on binding arbitrations. He has always seemed intelligent and prepared. He hasn't always ruled my way, but his opinions always seem to be well thought out.

    He is not afraid to make a ruling and he is respectful to attorneys and litigants. All of these things make him better than several of the sitting judges that currently preside in civil matters.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I like Marc Risman, but if he claims Judge Guy was a mentor, then his judgment is impaired. I am surprised he could understand anything old marble-mouth Judge Guy had to say.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I've had 2 cases with Phil Dabney. He's fair, personable and smart. The first case he won on a motion. The second case settleed but went through the system. He was professional.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Phil handed me my first loss as a young litigator. For that reason alone, I prefer that he be on the bench and not stealing my wins.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Wasn't Phil previously partners with Dennis Haney? He deserves sainthood, not a place on the bench.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Ok folks here is the scoop.....

    Dabney--Didn't he get a complaint calling himself a "judge" as a Pro Tem once before when he ran? He is burnt out and will make a terrible judge.


    Kishner--Being female will emerge no matter what. Has no experience to be a trial judge. Isn't she an employment and or gaming lawyer? Nice work but that does not make a qualified jurist.

    Risman--Sensible and been around the block. He is kind of goofy though. Don't know whey he would want the job.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Sometimes I believe the negative posts because I don't know all of the candidates. In this case I'm familiar with Phil and the negative posts are making me question whether or not our posters are just a bunch of whiney bitches.

    ReplyDelete
  15. 4:43 pm No. 13 It is important to have a divergence of opinion. Did you know Dabney is part of the gang that hired Nancy Alf's husband as a campaign consultant. These candidates act like they have the election sowed up. This is very foolish on their part and Dabney would have been far better off if he was not part of that group of losers.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Thank God that when I worked there and we had our ass handed to us blogs wasn't around yet.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Kishner is an excellent lawyer. It would be nice to have someone on our state court bench that is intelligent and committed to being prepared.

    This race shows what is wrong with our judge selection process. We have 2 or 3 pretty good candidates running for this department while some of the other races have no qualified candidates.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Joanna Kishner is someone who doesn't miss the details, which is what I personally want to see in a judge. She cares about all aspects and in being thorough.

    Joanna works in labor law, so she understands the working person. She is definitely the best choice for Dept. 31!

    ReplyDelete
  19. I met Joanna recently and really liked her. She seems like she has a good head on her shoulders and a lot of great experience.

    ReplyDelete