Friday, May 30, 2008

Fri Roundup

Unlike former NBA star Charles Barkley and suspended NFL genius Pacman Jones, Democratic Party fundraiser Tony Rezko isn't going down over casino debts without a fight. (Las Vegas Sun)

The Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline voted to continue monitoring Nevada Senior District Judge Charles McGee to ensure he was getting proper alcohol abuse monitoring. (Reno Gazette-Journal) [wait a minute . . . attorneys aren't allowed to abuse alcohol? the state bar needs to investigate . . . every attorney I've ever met]

The Clark Co. D.A. has filed charges against Harrah's with illegally doing work on the fire control and fire alarm systems at three of the company's hotels. (Las Vegas Now)

Up in Carson City, arrests are on the decline overall, but gang-related arrests have increased. (Nevada Appeal)

The Nevada Supremes held that the Clark Co. D.A. can pursue the death penalty for a murder-for-hire defendant by using "pecuniary gain" as an aggravating circumstance. (Review-Journal)

Congratulations to Mark Gardberg on being hired as an Business Law Associate at Lionel Sawyer. (Review-Journal)

The Las Vegas Police Department will pay $290,000 to settle a lawsuit filed by a man who said he was wrongfully arrested after repossessing his ex-wife's car. (Review-Journal)

Thursday, May 29, 2008

Halverson gets 67 days to prepare a Harvard Law Review-level defense

A panel of the Nevada Judicial Discipline Commission gave Judge Halverson 67 days to prepare her defense--that's just over two months for her to continue to be tons of embarrassing fun.

The Review-Journal reports:

The Nevada Judicial Discipline Commission today agreed to give embattled Clark
County District Judge Elizabeth Halverson just over 60 days to prepare for an upcoming hearing where she could be removed from the bench.

The panel also allowed the three attorneys who had been representing her to withdraw from her case.

Halverson, who said she could not pay the legal bills, will now represent herself in the hearing originally scheduled for June 9. Because her attorneys were allowed to withdraw, the commission gave Halverson 67 days to prepare. The new hearing date is Aug. 4.

Better bring your A game Judge Halverson or in two months this state could finally be free of the massive embarrassment of leaving you on the bench.

Merger Rumor Mill--Kummer Kaempfer

After Hale Lane merged with Holland & Hart this week, giving Holland & Hart a super-charged Nevada presence, rumors are circulating that international giant Greenberg Traurig is merging with growing Nevada corporate law titan Kummer Kaempfer. (Greedy Wild West Board)

Anyone out there have details or confirmation?

Thurs Roundup

Judge Leavitt's brother campaigns for his sister with bare knuckles, or at least strongly worded language. (Review-Journal)

Speaking of bare knuckles, the soon-to-be ex-Mrs. Gibbons came out of her corner fighting yesterday. She's asking the court to unseal the divorce proceedings and told the press that Governor Gibbons had an affair. (Review-Journal)

A discussion of how the Sands Corp. loss in the Macau businessman is more evidence of the company's financial woes. (Forbes)

Some families go on t.v. and play Family Feud. Others go to a Winnemucca bar and open fire on their relatives. (Review-Journal)

Next up on the D.A.'s casino debt hit list: Democratic party fundraiser Antonin Rezko, who has ties to Presidential candidate Barak Obama. (Las Vegas Sun)

Copper wire thieves face self-imposed electrocution. (Las Vegas Sun)

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

New (Old) Halverson News [it's new(s) to you]

Why so much Halverson today? Well. the blog received a lot of emails following a post last week where we quoted Judge Chairez stating that Judge Halverson was a good law clerk and produced Harvard Law Review-quality work. In the mix of emails, the author of Lowering the Bar sent along some California case law showing Halverson has a long history of skirting procedures and rules.

After leaving San Francisco for Vegas and a law clerk position, Halverson allowed her sister to take over the rent controlled apartment Halverson held in San Francisco. Very generous, except that it violated the terms of the lease and the rent control board. Every time the rental association would ask if Judge (then law clerk) Halverson was returning, the sister always replied soon or next week. The California Court of Appeal, First District, Division 5 was less than impressed and ruled that Elizabeth Halverson (then Elizabeth La Macchia) had to give up the apartment and pay attorneys' fees.

This California judgment followed Halverson to Nevada and is the basis of the $42,000 judgment against her that she has failed to pay in Faziola v. La Macchia, No. A497569 (Dist. Ct. Clark County Nev.). The California court has essentially suggested Halverson engaged in fraud by keeping her name on a rent controlled apt. lease and letting her sister live there. Seems like Halverson has had trouble following the law for a long time. Seems like a good person to put on the bench, doesn't it?

The full opinion is available at 2004 WL 1161646 (Cal.App. 1 Dist.). Make sure you check out the part on pg 3 where the Court lays the smackdown on Halverson's counsel for being inept. Don't have Westlaw access? The full opinion is also posted on a Texas blog and available here. Yes, thanks to Halverson, even Texas makes fun of Nevada.

[hat tip to Lowering the Bar]

Wed Roundup

The Clark Co. District Attorney's office is challenging the Nevada Attorney General's ruling about term limits. (Nevada Appeal)

The media reports on the Holland & Hart merger with Hale Lane, which makes H&H the biggest firm in the Mountain West. (Denver Business Journal)

Lawyers in the "bodybuilders murder" prosecution of Craig Titus and Kelly Ryan are again asking the Nevada Supreme Court to intervene and postpone their trial in the slaying of their live-in personal assistant. (Review-Journal)

The Clark Co. Coroner says cocaine was involved in the mysterious death of Buffalo Jim Barrier. (Review-Journal)

The city attorney for Sparks is appealing the ruling of Judge Maddox that Councilman Mike Carrigan should have abstained from voting on a casino project due to conflict of interest. (Review-Journal)

Las Vegas City Life pronounces all lawyers are d-bags based on feedback from the Adam Kutner article. (Las Vegas City Life)

U.S. District Judge Hunt has ordered a Las Vegas developer convicted of wire fraud and conspiracy to report to federal prison. (Nevada Appeal)

8 candidates have put their name in the hat to replace Family Court Judge Gerald Hardcastle. (Harmful Error)

Slow News Day? Judge Halverson to the Rescue!

Nevada's national embarrassment is back in the headlines today after her attorneys asked to withdraw from representing her, citing irreconcilable differences. (Review-Journal) Attorneys Dominic Gentile, William Gamage and John Arrascada won't say what "irreconcilable differences" have arisen, but the San Jose Mercury News is reporting that what is irreconcilable is Halverson's refusal to pay her legal bills:

Halverson said she was told by the lawyers that she owed them more than $90,000 and to go to trial would cost "upwards of an additional $125,000." The judge added that she can't pay since "over the last year I have paid or incurred in excess of $120,000 in legal fees."
Sounds to me like Halverson's attorneys quit simply because she is the size of a whale. Since when did legal representation become a beauty contest?
What's a ton of fun jurist to do? Halverson says she will represent herself and is asking for a delay to prepare:

But Halverson, in her response to the motion, said the real issue is her inability to pay the attorneys' fees. Halverson told the commission she has no choice but to proceed with the case on her own.

But she has also asked the commission to delay the hearing for five months because of the need to take over as her own attorney. Halverson's attorneys and Dorothy Nash Holmes, special prosecutor for the Judicial Discipline Commission, have asked the commission for a quick decision on the motion because of the impending hearing.

A hearing on the various motions has been set for Thursday in Reno.

Halverson failing to pay her bills? Shocking. Wait, no . . . par for the course. Weird that a judicial candidate and sitting (although suspended) judge who has a passion for what is right and a commitment for what is just would refuse to pay her bills.

[hat tip to SG for the SJ Mercury News article]

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Hale Lane/Holland Hart Firm Merger--another Giant in our Midst


Update: Numbers of attorneys at 3 largest firms have been updated.

Holland & Hart LLP and Hale Lane Peek Dennison and Howard announced today that the firms are merging.



The new Nevada mega firm will retain the name Holland & Hart and will now have 63 attorneys in the state. At 63 attorneys, H&H leapfrogs Kummer Kaempfer Bonner Renshaw & Ferrario and becomes the firm with the third largest number of attorneys in the state (according to Martindale numbers). Who's #1 and #2? That would be Lewis & Roca as the runner up, clocking in at 75 attorneys in Nevada. And first prize still goes to and Lionel Sawyer, holding steady at 77 attorneys. [Better watch your backs 1 & 2, in merger world you can get leapfrogged pretty easily].



The Press Release, which is frightfully boring is available here, but being very mature I prefer to imagine the merger as similar to the formation of Voltron: individual warriors coming together to form one behemoth to crush the competition.

Monday, May 26, 2008

Weekend Roundup

$43.8 million has been awarded to a Hong Kong businessman out of the Sands Corp. coffers. (Review-Journal) Pretty hefty judgment since Sands Corp. and Adelman had Rusty Hardin and Sam Lionel on board as defense counsel. Rusty Hardin is also former MLB pitcher Roger Clemens' defense counsel and [allegedly] an asshole.

Meet Jason Landess, one of two candidates to replace Nevada's national embarassment (a.k.a. Judge Halverson). He's a 30 year litigator who carries some old baggage (gambling debt, family issues), but believes those old demons make him a better candidate for the judicial seat. (Review-Journal) [Judge Stefany Miley is also running for the seat].

Suspended NFL running back Adam "Pacman" Jones paid off the $20,000 debt he owed to Caesars. (Las Vegas Sun)

Review-Journal columnist got called in for jury duty. Surprise! He didn't enjoy the experience. (Review-Journal)

One of the "show and tell" killers may be headed back to prison after being charged with kidnapping and sexual assault on his girlfriend. (Nevada Appeal)

Governor Gibbons isn't happy this week, since his soon-to-be ex-wife has moved to have the divorce proceedings and divorce record unsealed for the public, arguing that sealing the record was unconstitutional. (Review-Journal) [sounds like if the case is unsealed, the personal and political gossip about the Gov. will come pouring out].

The Nevada Board of Medical Examiners is attempting to defend its investigation of Dr. "Needles" Desai. (Review-Journal)

Friday, May 23, 2008

Judging the Judges--Should NV Judges be Appointed?/Halverson Update

An article in the RJ says that Nevada attorneys think NV judges should be appointed rather than elected by a 2 to 1 ratio. (Review-Journal) The article discusses the pros and cons of an appointment system from various authorities, all of which boil down to the usual rhetoric: by appointment=citizens judged by an elitist attorney who received seat in undemocratic manner; by election=too many unqualified people get elected to the bench because they can afford big campaign signs.

As reported here before, judicial appointment may soon be a reality in Nevada through a hybrid election-appointment system proposed in a bill before the Nevada Senate. (Review-Journal) Under the proposed system, state judges would be appointed by the Governor and voters would be able to vote "up or down" on each judge after a few years on the bench (i.e. whether to keep or replace the judge based on her record).

Finally, Harmful Error notes that the Nevada Supreme Court has expedited Judge Halverson's Constitutional challenge to her name appearing on the ballot this year. The argument will take place Friday June 13 at 10:30 a.m. and the order is available here. (via Harmful Error)

And since we received a couple of emails and comments about being too mean to suspended Judge Halverson, the blog offers this kind quote about Judge Halverson from former Judge Chairez:

“Unfortunately, she doesn’t have good people skills when she’s being attacked,” says Don Chairez, a former Clark County district judge who originally hired Halverson as a law clerk in 1995. They were law school classmates at the University of Southern California.

“But she did the heavy lifting in that court. When judges had complex issues, they came to her to write their memos. And they got Harvard Law Review-quality work,” says Chairez.


So in an effort to make up for my bitchiness, I offer this compliment to Judge Halverson: once you've been permanently removed as a jurist, I'm sure you will make an excellent permanent law clerk for a judge qualified to be on the bench.

[hat tip to Abovethelaw and Harmful Error]

Friday Roundup

The defense gave closing arguments in the Sands Corp. trial yesterday, arguing that the Plaintiff didn't actually do anything to set Sands Corp. up in Macau. (Review-Journal)

Property tax-cap advocate Sharron Angle will challenge the state's petition procedure to get a measure on the election ballot as unconstitutional. Ms. Angle's anti-property tax petition was not accepted by Clark Co. because the petition signatures were turned in to the county after the established deadline. (Review-Journal) [note for attorneys and other advocates: don't launch a state-wide campaign if you can't meet deadlines]

Judge Jackie Glass starts screening potential jurors for the O.J. trial [pt 2]. As many as 400 jurors are expected to be screened. (Review-Journal)

And apparently it's celebrity gambling debt week here in Vegas: the D.A. wants suspended NFL running back (and genius) Pacman Jones to repay the $20,000 he owes to Ceasars Palace. (Las Vegas Sun) [maybe he can pay Ceasars by making it rain]

Nevadans will get a chance to meet former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor at the Cowboy Poetry Festival in Elko. (Harmful Error)

U.S. Senator and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) introduced a bill before the Senate to allocate $5 million to assist in Southern Nevada's investigation of the Hep-C crisis. (Review-Journal)

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Adam Kutner: Biggest Douchebag - Smallest Penis in Vegas?



Move over 4 ft 10" Heavy Hitter. According to an article in this week's Las Vegas City Life, Adam Kutner (penis pic here) may just win the worst attorney of the year award.

The Las Vegas City Life article notes a litany of [alleged] d-bag behavior. Here are a few examples of his [allegedly] winning personality:

  • Menacing secretaries with a golf club;
  • throwing cell phones at his assistants;
  • calling support staff "Fat bitches," "Fucking dumb-asses," "Cunts," and "Morons";
  • telling individual staff they are "fucking stupid," a "fucking useless moron," a "fucking stupid idiot";
  • saying Hispanics were lazy and stupid to his mostly Hispanic staff;
  • making his secretary watch him groom himself;
  • bragging about his sexual conquests to support staff;
  • getting in screaming fits when he doesn't get the right type of water on his desk (Fiji);
  • having employees occasionally shave his neck;
  • talking about women's breasts to the secretaries (Kutner [allegedly] stated that he likes "girls with little boobs that fit in his hand");
  • walking through the secretarial pool while swinging a golf club and asking who wants to get fired;
  • screaming at a secretary for going to lunch with staff--then when she said it was her birthday, he crumpled a $100 bill and threw it at her;
  • punching a hole in the drywall with a door knob in a fit of anger.
Honestly, this list isn't doing the story justice. You have to read the whole Las Vegas City Life piece because it's the outlandishness of Vegas law at its best.

For his part, Kutner has sued many of the women alleging the behavior listed above for libel (although the article notes that former staff not involved in the lawsuit confirm at least some of the d-bag behavior). He alleges that all of the former secretaries are lying as part of a conspiracy against his firm by personal injury competitor Habbas, Bognar & Associates.


Personally, I can't decide which story will be more fun to follow: Kutner as the uber-douchebag attorney of Vegas or a conspiracy to bring down Kutner by a rival personal injury firm. Either way, this will be fun to watch.

Judging the Judges about their knowledge of the law

Shockingly, the Review-Journal reports that some lawyers believe judges favor local counsel who participate in "pay to play". (Review-Journal). Not familiar with that system? Just ask Plaintiff's super-attorney Robert Vannah about it--he has "five or six judges that will do anything [he] want[s]". Other attorneys see prejudice by jurists on the basis of religion/gender/ethnicity. (Review-Journal)

Meanwhile, some attorneys simply think the judges don't know or don't care about the law and procedure argued before them. (Review-Journal). Here are some highlights from the article:
  • Several lawyers commented in the evaluation that Judge Lisa Kent often was reluctant to take a position on cases. Judge Kent responded "It's a misconception that I don't know family law because I've practiced it my whole career." She said "I think I do a good job for children and families in Clark County."

  • A staggering 84 percent of respondents questioned how District Judge Elizabeth Halverson exercises the law, far and away the poorest rating of any jurist evaluated. [oh but her attorney is sure that's just because they're engaging in a "beauty contest". Why is this woman still on the bench? She is a national (and repetitive) black eye for Nevada law.]

  • 59 percent of attorneys said Judge Jesse Walsh was less than adequate in applying the law. She replied "I think my numbers reflect improvement." Her retention ratings have increased from 31 percent in 2004 to 34 percent in 2006 to 41 percent this year.

  • 48 percent of respondents said Judge Stefanie Miley was less than adequate in applying the law (the sixth lowest score of any judge in any court surveyed). Some attorneys noted "She appears to be only mildly interested in her job and more interested in furthering her own career." Miley said she has confidence in her ability and aspires to be on the Nevada Supreme Court.

Who's at the top for applying the law? Well, Family Court Judge Gloria Sanchez of course (who also has a 97% retention rating). And, as it should be, the Chief Justice of the Nevada Supreme Court Mark Gibbons. Congratulations to Justice Gibbons and Judge Sanchez for reminding us gossipy bloggers that the bench is also filled with the keenest legal minds.

Thurs Roundup

The Plaintiff in the Sands Corp. case delivered closing arguments to the jury yesterday, requesting they award $100 million in damages. (Review-Journal)

Why did all the a Federal Judge from Washington have to be brought in for the Noel Gage trial? Apparently Chief Judge of the U.S. District of Nevada Roger Hunt decided their involvement with Gage through Inns of Court would require all Federal Judges in the state to recuse themselves. (Las Vegas City Life--below the piece on Robert Downey, Jr.) George Knapp suggests it might have more to do with the desire of many judges not to be involved in trying a prominent local Plaintiff's hero. (Las Vegas City Life)

Clark Co. has joined all the other governmental entities challenging the Nevada Supreme Court's ruling that limits taxes on restaurant food. (Las Vegas Now)

Nevada's anti-Yucca legal hero Joseph Egan may have passed, but the fight goes on with his firm Egan, Fitzpatrick & Malsch still carrying the mantle. (Las Vegas Business Press)

Clark Co. is going after residents who are delinquent on their property taxes by publishing their names and the amount owed to the county in local newspapers. (Las Vegas Now)

Whoops. Clark Co. School District may end up paying more than $5 million to a construction company over an unpaid debt when it could have settled for $175,000 in 1997. (Las Vegas Sun)

In other lawyers-are-expensive news, the Clark Co. Library District and the non-profit Friends of the Library have realized their dispute is not worth the $44,000 in legal bills (Las Vegas Sun) [Interesting to note, they still haven't settled]

The Clark Co. D.A. has finally received notice that Charles Barkley paid his Wynn debt. (Las Vegas Sun)

In Business Las Vegas has an interview with UNLV Boyd School founding Dean Richard Morgan about his career, new position with Lionel Sawyer, and his opinion of Boyd grads as attorneys. (In Business Las Vegas)

Congratulations to Holly Fic for her new Associate position with Jolley Urga Wirth Woodbury & Standish here in Vegas. (Review-Journal)

[thanks to VD for the Richard Morgan tip]

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Vannah: "has five or six judges that will do anything" he wants

The hero of Plaintiff's attorneys across the Vegas Valley, Robert Vannah, was taped explaining that his firm uses judicial campaign donations to further their cases.

Las Vegas Now reports:

"Most of those guys go out there -- a good night on the campaign trail is $5,000. $35,000 for, obviously they just drool," he said. . .

". . . There's five or six judges that will do anything I want. They don't do it for Howard [Awand], so it's for me. I mean, we've got some great friends over there."

But, like any good attorney, Vannah is able to find the gray between contribution and bribe, suggesting:

"Obviously, you understand. I mean, if you control whether they get re-elected or not, when it comes time. I never talked to them and say, 'Hey listen, I want to meet you in the backroom and this is the deal.' That doesn't happen. We go to court. We go there honestly. We're there, but they know who we are and when it comes down to it, I just say to the judge, ‘This is a big deal to me. This is not ticky tacky. This is a big motion and this is really important.' There's a couple of different ways, but by and large, that's the message," he said.
Well how about that. He doesn't bribe the judge. He just "honestly" lets the judge know that his/her biggest contributor wants to win the motion being argued in front of the judge.

Not convinced it's not a corrupt practice? Well, let Mr. Vannah further persuade:
We're not corrupt. We're not corrupt. I mean, we are not corrupt. That's just
not happening . . .
The last quote comes from Vannah's condemnation of how Howard Awand was shooting his mouth off about having judges that will do anything he wants. Um . . . yes, that's the same [allegedly] corrupt to the core Howard Awand who was [allegedly] cheating legal clients out of money with Noel Gage [and um . . . yes, he's complaining that Awand is using the words that he uses above about having judges in their pocket for "important" motions].

Vannah has been long rumored to be on the corruption chopping block if the U.S. Attorneys obtain a conviction against Noel Gage. If the Gage trial tanks I wonder if this town will ever clear up the [alleged] practices of the Plaintiff's Bar.

Wed Roundup

An article examines why male attorneys in Vegas ranked female jurists so low in the Judging the Judges survey. (Review-Journal)

Meanwhile, Noel Gage's attorneys are saying the U.S. Attorneys never informed them that the U.S. Attorney's office interviewed [allegedly] crooked Dr. Mark Kabins before the trial began. (Review-Journal)

An article details the story behind the arrest of a Clark Co. Public Defender for domestic abuse and the heavy use of alcohol that preceded the [alleged] assault. (Review-Journal)

And to ensure some domestic violence gender equality: Nevada Assemblywoman Francis Allen was arrested on Saturday for [allegedly] stabbing her husband in the arm with a steak knife. (Review-Journal)

Confirmation, finally, that former NBA star Charles Barkley paid his casino debt. (Review-Journal) Steve Wynn comments that he was obliged to not ignore the debt simply because Sir Charles was famous. (Las Vegas Sun) [Yes, it's clearly a slow news week--I've reported on this 3 times already]

The Aryan nation is active in Nevada prisons--members recently [allegedly] killed one inmate and stabbed another. (Review-Journal)

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Tues Roundup

The Nevada teachers and casinos have reached an agreement to keep the gaming tax bid off the ballot next election. (Las Vegas Sun)

U.S. District Court Judge Lloyd George ordered U.S. Marshalls to use necessary force to help a receiver obtain property and records of Las Vegas-based Gold-Quest International, which the government accuses of operating a $27.9 million fraud. (Review-Journal)

Former NBA star Charles Barkley says he's repaid the $400,000 debt owed to Wynn casinos, but D.A. David Rogers says his office haven't seen any money repaid. (Las Vegas Sun) Either way, Sir Charles says he's done with gambling for awhile. (ESPN)

A Deputy Public Defender was arrested on a domestic violence call. (Review-Journal) [First drunk driving, now domestic abuse. Maybe the Clark Co. PDs are getting a little stressed out having 2.5x the recommended felony/gross misdemeanor caseload]

The Review-Journal discusses Chief Judge Hardcastle's [pictured above] low score in the Judging the Judges survey and her legacy as Chief Judge. (Review-Journal)

I-Team covers how kids are treated in the juvenile system through the case study of a 16 yr old girl who robbed a Burger King at gunpoint, but "didn't think it would be that serious". (Las Vegas Now)

Monday, May 19, 2008

Scandals behind the judicial rankings





Accompanying the Judging the Judges report, the Review-Journal published an article detailing the judicial scandals that may have led to some of the low rankings. Here's the juicy bits:

  • Judge Halverson is accused of mistreating staff, sleeping on the bench and illegally communicating with jurors. She was suspended with pay in July. Only 8 percent of the 303 attorneys who rated her said she should be retained;
  • Judge Del Vecchio stands accused of sexually abusing his ex-wife's daughter when she was a minor and sexually harassing her as an adult while she worked as his executive assistant.
    Since the allegations went public, Judge Del Vecchio's retention score took a nose dive, falling 36 percentage points to 41 percent this year;

  • Family Court Judge Steven Jones was arrested on a domestic battery charge two years ago after his live-in girlfriend said he threw her down a hall. She later recanted her story, saying it was fueled by chronic alcoholism. The incident was the fourth time in as many years that police arrested someone at the judge's home on domestic violence charges.
    Jones still earned a retention rate of 72 percent, "[b]ut that is down 13 percentage points from the 2006 survey";

  • Chief Judge Kathy Hardcastle "drew some of the harshest condemnation in comments included in the survey." Some partly blamed Hardcastle for the Halverson debacle and critics called her "heavy-handed and vendetta-driven". One lawyer wrote, "Whatever my opinions of Judge Halverson, I did not then nor do I now believe that Judge Hardcastle had the authority to take the actions she did." Judge Hardcastle's retention score was 54 percent, down from 60 percent in 2006;

  • Justice Nancy Saitta, "who at 45 percent received the worst retention score among state Supreme Court justices, was criticized for exaggerating her credentials." She claimed on her 2006 campaign Web site to have been an associate professor in political science at UNLV when "[i]n fact, she was a part-time instructor";

  • District Court Judge Donald M. Mosley "was singled out as a case study by the Los Angeles Times for giving unspent campaign funds to a girlfriend who he said repaid them." His retention score was 56 percent, down 10 percentage points from two years ago;

  • Municipal Court Judge George Assad got a retention score of 44 percent, down 23 percentage points after he was reprimanded last year by the Judicial Discipline Commission for detaining a woman in 2003 for no legally justifiable reason.

  • District Court Judge Lee Gates saw his rating fall 6 percentage points to 43 percent after agreeing to acknowledge making two improper $5,000 campaign donations in 2004.
Ah the Nevada Judiciary: stalwarts of decency and ethical values, as those sitting in judgment should be.

Judicial Ratings--Let the Fun Begin!!!!

The Review-Journal has released the 2008 Judging the Judges results. The study is a "biennial survey of local attorneys rating judges & Supreme Court justices." This year, the survey was completed by 799 respondents.

The results show ratings based on the judges' understanding of the law, application of the law, clarity of explanation, professional conduct, bias and courtesy. In addition, the survey culminates with a rating of what percent of attorneys would want the Justice/Judge retained. A Review-Journal article suggests low scores tend to determine whether the judge's seat is being seriously challenged. (Review-Journal)

Here are the retention results:

Mark Gibbons 86%
A. William Maupin 84%
Ron D. Parraguirre 80%
Michael A. Cherry 78%
Michael Douglas 77%
James W. Hardesty 71%
Nancy Saitta 45%

[ouch--see Review-Journal article discussing why Justice Saitta's rankings are so far below her peers]

8th District (Crim/Civil)
David Barker 92%
Stewart L. Bell 91%
Allan R. Earl 90%
Mark R. Denton 88%
Douglas W. Herndon 88%
David Wall 88%
Jennifer M. Togliatti 85%
Timothy Williams 83%
Elissa Cadish 82%
Elizabeth Gonzalez 82%
James Bixler 81%
Michel Villani 81%
Valerie Adair 80%
Susan Johnson 80%
Kenneth C. Corey 74%
Valerie J. Vega 70%
Sally L. Loehrer 69%
Jackie Glass 62%
Donald M. Mosley 56%
Michelle Leavitt 56%
Kathy Hardcastle 54%
Lee A. Gates 43%
Jessie Walsh 41%
Elizabeth Halverson 8%

[uh . . . yikes Judge Halverson, but not really unexpected when you're a national embarassment]

Gloria S. Sanchez 97%
T. Arthur Ritchie 88%
William O. Voy 88%
William S. Potter 80%
Jennifer Elliot 73%
Steven E. Jones 72%
Sandra M. Pomrenze 62%
Cynthia Dianne Steel 60%
Stefany Miley 55%
Gerald W. Hardcastle 54%
Cheryl B. Moss 52%
N. Anthony Del Vecchio 41%
Lisa Kent 36%

Holy crap, Judge Sanchez--97%. How beloved are you?

C'mon Judge Kent! 5 percentage points behind [alleged] child molestor Judge Del Vecchio. You can do better than that.

The Review-Journal also has rankings for Justice Court Judges and Municipal Court Judges.

Endoscopy News--CDC chimes in on cause of Hep-C

A report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that (at least) six Endoscopy patients tested position for Hep-C just weeks after receiving anesthesia from one of two anesthesia nurses who reported repeatedly reusing needles.

The Las Vegas Review-Journal reports:
One of the nurse anesthetists told health investigators that the practice of reusing syringes and single-dose vials of propofol -- a fast-acting sedative -- "reflected what clinic staff had instructed him to do," according to the report . . .
The CDC concludes, as did the Southern Nevada Health District and the Nevada State Health Division, that unsafe injection practices probably resulted in six people contracting hepatitis C at the Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada on July 25 and Sept. 21 of last year. The nurses would use a syringe on an infected patient, and then reuse the syringe to draw medication for the patient, contaminating the medication vial for patients down the line.

Saturday, May 17, 2008

Weekend Roundup

Corrections officer files a civil rights suit against the North Las Vegas police, alleging unlawful arrest. (KNTV)

Judge Halverson reported for jury duty. (Las Vegas Sun)

Emergency regulations now in place to make sure babies born to women behind bars are given to responsible caregivers. (Review-Journal)

The juror dismissed from the Sands corp case for calling attorney Rusty Hardin an "asshole" explained that he thought Hardin was asking the same question over and over to an expert witness. (Review-Journal)

The state announced it will only pay for the salary of new Clark Co. judges, leaving the county with the bill for judicial staff salaries. (Review-Journal)

Congratulations to Ballard Spahr's Joshua Resiman for getting the Ninth Circuit to reaffirmed that the right to sue over design-and-construction violations of the Fair Housing Act (FHA) expires two years after a project’s completion. (Business Wire)

Follow-up Questions on Lateral Hiring

An Epilogue to our interview with Jordan Ross about lateral hiring in the great state of Nevada:

22. In light of his answer to question # 16, what about going the other direction - from a prosecutor's office to a civil firm. Is courtroom experience likely to help get the job? Will they start you at a higher pay scale as a result of your jury experience?

No and no. Even if a firm will hire you at all expect to start as a first year with absolutely no seniority at all. You will also have to be completely retrained for an entirely different work culture. Your prosecutorial experience will not only not be an asset; it will most likely be considered a liability. This is due not only to the different work culture (public sector versus private profit making sector), but also because of the vast difference between criminal and civil law. Criminal law skills, to be blunt, are not held in high regard in civil litigation, especially in commercial firms.
23. How has the influx of new firms affected your practice? They must all want attorneys with top grades from top schools but there are only so many of them to go around in Vegas.

My personal practice obviously benefits from the attention of new clients entering an unfamiliar market. Many of these firms do want higher school and class rank than historically have been desired by domestic firms, but some of them are adjusting this to compensate for being in a secondary market. It’s one thing to demand 20/20 attorneys (top 20 law school, top 20% of the class) in New York, Chicago or Los Angeles, but another entirely in Pittsburg, Baltimore, Las Vegas or Austin. Your question also is focused only on demand. The attorneys go where the work is. No one looks for associates first. They look for partners first because they have the work. And schools and grades are secondary when you have the book of business.
24. Do you find lesser firms on the losing end of the stick here, having to accept a lower quality candidate? Or is there more recruiting from outside of the local bar?

Again, think supply as well as demand. A local firm loses out mostly if they lose a partner. If they lose the partner, the associate doesn’t matter now does it? The firm no longer has the work to feed them.
25. Is this better/worse for the local practice of law?

It’s irrelevant. Does your question imply something should be done to stop new firms coming to town? We tried that for decades with the old State Supreme Court Rule 199 and it had to be repealed due to anti-trust laws. Better or worse, it’s happening, so learn to recruit new clients and sell as much as possible to existing clients. I predicted this when Rule 199 was repealed. Adapt or die. Firms must grow their business. They can acquire, be acquired, or get new clients. Suck it up.
If you have future questions or want to hire a legal recruiter, you can reach Jordan Ross at info@rosslegal.com.

[Thank you again to Mr. Ross for answering all of the questions submitted by readers].

Friday, May 16, 2008

Juror dismissed because Rusty Hardin is [allegedly] an asshole

The Review-Journal reports:
A juror in the month-long civil trial against the world's 12th richest man was dismissed late Thursday after calling an attorney in the case an "asshole." . . .

The juror that was dismissed apparently blurted out the word while Sands attorney Rusty Hardin was questioning a witness, forcing Clark County District Judge Michelle Leavitt to stop the trial to determine what happened and who overheard the juror's remark.
Like everyone in the courtroom didn't already know Hardin was an [alleged] asshole. He sure seemed like an asshole when he represented Roger Clemens testifying before Congress.

I think the court acted too quickly. I mean . . . at least the juror was awake and paying attention.

Friday Roundup

Sir Charles Barkley says he'll pay the Wynn the $400,000 he owes, but hasn't contacted the Clark Co. D.A. about the debt yet. (Las Vegas Sun)

The California Supreme Court struck down the state's ban on gay marriage and you can read the opinion here. (WaPo) Why should that matter in NV? Well, we carbon copy every other California legal doctrine, why would this be any different? Because unlike in California, the ban on gay marriage in Nevada is by Constitutional amendment (not statute). As a result, for gay marriage to be legal, another constitutional amendment would need to be added to eliminate the current ban. (Review-Journal)

Conducting an illegal closed-door meeting when you're a government entity can result in having any decisions made there erased as a matter of Nevada law, but the party harmed by the closed door can't sue for damages. (Review-Journal)

We here at WWL would like to welcome former Congressional candidate and former/current D.A. Robert Daskas back to the job of prosecuting Major Violators in Clark Co. (Review-Journal)

The former UMC Chief facing corruption charges wants the Clark Co. D.A.'s office removed from the case due to conflict of interest (Review-Journal)

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Thurs Roundup

Henderson Fire Dept. officials say the fire at the Alystra Casino building was likely started by homeless people. (Review-Journal)

In a jurisdiction that includes Judge Halverson and Judge del Vecchio, it's nice to have Judge Voy, who is still working to establish a safe house for teenagers caught up in prostitution. (Review-Journal)

Speaking of Judge del Vecchio, the Judicial Disciplinary Committee will not delay on its action against the family court and [alleged] child molester. (Review-Journal)

Nevada Supreme Court Justice Michael Cherry defended the Nevada Senior Judge system as "providing a bang for our buck" and freeing up other judges from heavy caseloads. (Review-Journal)

Sheldon Adelson was questioned by Israeli police in connection with a potential bribery case (Las Vegas Sun)

The Wynn is suing Charles Barkley, claiming that he has a $400,000 outstanding gambling debt (Las Vegas Sun)

Felony charges will stand against former Clark Co. Commissioner Lynette Boggs. (Review-Journal)

Clark Co. may be richer thanks to its failure to return attorney deposits of earnest money over the years (Las Vegas Sun)

A breakdown of the four candidates running for the open Nevada Supreme Court seat. (Review-Journal)

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Associate Lateral Advice (pt 3 of 3)

It's time for the final installment (part 3 of 3) of our interview about the lateral hiring process for associates with Jordan Ross, member of the National Association of Legal Search Consultants and principal of Ross Legal Search, LLC:

15. How valuable is it to an attorney admitted in Nevada to be admitted in other jurisdictions (CA, UT, AZ, D.C.) when applying to Vegas firms?

Depends on your practice area. Good for federal work like IP or bankruptcy. For high volume work it probably won’t make a difference. For most commercial work it will largely matter only if an individual firm has clients that cross state borders or if they need to target an industry in that fashion. It also helps if they have offices in states where you’re admitted. Obviously, not very important for transactionals.
16. Do you have any advice for how someone working at a corporate firm can transfer into a Prosecutor’s office?

Show up with a pulse. Aside from the feds, the admission regime for most county prosecutors isn’t like applying to an AmLaw 100 firm. If you have no prior criminal experience, you’ll start at the bottom of the range, but it’s steady work.
17. I want to move from an insurance defense firm to an employment law or corporate finance firm, how do I do that?

You probably don’t. I suggest you look at my answer to question number 2. Not good news.
18. Would getting a clerkship with the NV Supreme Court or Federal Court help someone move from a small firm to a national/larger firm? Would it help to get a clerkship if I wanted to switch the area of law I practice (i.e. medical malpractice to estate planning)?

I hate to keep sounding a like a drag, but what you do right out of law school is so critical. It can label you for life. It is very hard to change practice areas, you are essentially starting your career over. Going from Associate to Law Clerk is a step backwards and will not look good. However if you’re talking about things like medical malpractice or estate planning, these are not commercial practice areas anyway and you can probably get a small or medium sized firm to train you if you can convince them you’ll work your ass off and stay several years with them. By the way, clerking is worthless for transactionals.
19. Does hiring a headhunter help attorneys find a job with a larger firm?

Hiring a headhunter helps you find a job with any firm large or small. And remember, it’s not the size that counts, but the billing rate. Don’t pass over medium sized or even smaller firms if they’re truly boutique. And a high end recruiter doesn’t have to go in the front door with the other 400,000 applicants.

20. How should an attorney evaluate calls from headhunters?


If their first name isn’t Jordan, then they’re obviously axe murderers. Seriously, if it sounds like someone is reading from a script or has the social skills of a tax accountant, take a pass. Legal recruiting is not like most other forms of recruiting, not even close. You can train a glorified clerk to recruit engineers, but not attorneys. Likewise if the recruiter is a "generalist" they probably don’t understand how radically different the legal industry is from corporate environments. And if they place attorneys "everywhere" or "across the nation" they very likely don’t have the kind of high quality relationships that a recruiter with a local focus does.

Membership in the National Association of Legal Search Consultants is not
mandatory, but you have to wonder why a recruiter doesn’t belong. There’s
usually one or more of four reasons that they don’t. First, they don’t do the
majority of their business in the permanent placement of attorneys, which NALSC
requires. They place paralegals and secretaries or they do other occupations,
etc. So they don’t have the focus that you need. The second reason is that they
don’t want to be subject to the NALSC Code of Ethics. That’s pretty self
explanatory. Third, they haven’t even heard of it. Duh. And fourth they can’t
afford it. Which is just sad.
21. In general, do you think the influx of national and regional firms is helpful or harmful to the legal community given dilution of the talent pool, increased competition for worthwhile attorneys (i.e., higher salaries), etc.?
First of all, helpful or harmful, it’s happening and going to continue to happen. In general competition is good for any industry, although the legal trade has an artificially restricted labor supply due to difficult licensing requirements, i.e., three years of law school and the bar exam. Is competition for higher salaries good for the “legal community”? Well it’s good for the guy who gets the higher salary, I know that. I think the ultimate micro-economic effect of this will be to further rationalize salaries within law firms. Today a high volume law firm, will not charge as much as a general commercial law firm. But within law firms, the diversity of billing rates is usually minimal. I think we’ll start to see greater diversity inside the same firm, between for example, routine real estate leasing transactional work and complex securities litigation or M&A consulting. It only makes sense to follow that with different salaries for attorneys based more on their billing rates. With slow but sure pressure from offshoreing of legal work, firms cannot continue to use the same business model they have for decades. They have to adapt or die.

If after this advice you want to pursue a position with a new firm through a legal recruiter, you can reach Jordan Ross at info@rosslegal.com.



[Our thanks to Mr. Ross for donating his time and wisdom to the readers of the blog]

Hump Day Roundup

The Nevada Parole Board's backlog will grow in June. (Nevada Appeal)

Harmful Error notes that Boyd School added four new faculty members. (UNLV Press Release)

Uh . . . Judge Halverson named "Hot Slut of the Day" by website. (dlisted.com)

Yucca Mountain dump opponent Joe Egan asked that his remains be spread over the proposed nuclear waste dump site and that the following eulogy be read: "Radwaste buried here only over my dead body." (KSBY)

A profile of Gordon & Rees, the San-Francisco-based firm (with a Vegas office) that has opened 10 offices outside of California in the past five years and now has more than 350 lawyers in 16 offices. (Lawjobs.com)

Endoscopy News
Dr. "Needles" Desai and his colleagues are expected to "plead the Fifth," which will stall the civil suits for years. (Las Vegas Sun) [it's a good legal tactic. maybe the plaintiffs should repay Dr. Needles by filling his Mercedes Benzes with used hypodermic needles--you know, just because it's an efficient way to dispose of medical waste and keep costs down].

Meanwhile, state legislators authored a letter criticizing state medical board Executive Director Tony Clark for refusing to comply with a police investigation and being misleading about his agency's response to the Hep-C crisis. (Las Vegas Sun) And the Governor says he will not name special counsel to investigate the doctors in the Hep-C crisis because that is the job of the state medical board. (Nevada Appeal)
The civil rights/sexual harassment case involving the state highway patrol has settled for $480,000. (Review-Journal)
Up north, Judge Steinheimer set the execution date for the rapist and killer of a 16 yr old girl (Reno Gazette-Journal)

Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Mon-Tues Roundup

Nevada Senior Judges are getting a pay cut. (Nevada Appeal)

Mainor Eglet Cottle filed a lawsuit on behalf of a Vegas homeowner who refinanced with an adjustable-rate mortgage in 2005 and can no longer afford his monthly housing payment.
The lawsuit accuses eight mortgage brokers of fraud, negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, negligent misrepresentation, intentional misrepresentation, and breach of covenant good faith and fair dealing. (Review-Journal)

The two (maybe gang member) teenagers who [allegedly] shot a high school freshman pled not guilty (Review-Journal)

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the Judge Roger Hunt's decision that Clark Co. school dress codes do not violate students' right to free speech after considering a case involving a junior suspended for wearing T-shirts expressing her religious faith.(Review-Journal)

Clark Co. Registrar of Voters, Larry Lomax filed an Answer to Judge Halverson's attempt to avoid running for re-election Monday, saying the embattled judge waited too long to claim her two-year term is unconstitutional and that Halverson knew about the term length when she campaigned in 2006 but didn't raise the issue then. (Review-Journal) [tip o' the hat to Harmful Error for posting the Answer]

Monday, May 12, 2008

Associate Lateral Advice (pt 2 of 3)

Here, for your reading pleasure, is part 2 of 3 of our interview about the lateral hiring process for associates with Jordan Ross, member of the National Association of Legal Search Consultants and principal of Ross Legal Search, LLC:

8. If I am at a smaller firm and want to move to a Vegas branch of a national firm or Phoenix-based firm, how can I make myself more marketable to the larger firm?

Sell at high billing rates. Bring loot to the table. See the [prior] cynical comments.
9. In a firm interview, is it appropriate to negotiate terms (salary, billable hour
requirement and years accepted from prior employment towards partnership track)?

Yes, but understand there won’t be a whole lot that a firm will move on, so suck it up. Unless you have portable book. That changes everything.
10. Do dual degrees (an MBA, Policy degree, or LLM) help marketability for laterals?

A little, but not as much as people think. An MBA is most valued for in house jobs, not so much in law firms. An LLM is swell and can make a difference, but it needs to match your practice area and even then don’t expect a firm to jump up and down about it. With IP, degrees can be absolutely critical for patent work.
11. Does pro bono work and community involvement really matter to a larger firm when applying?

Actually, despite my own personal cynicism about the world, it does matter to larger firms and also to most smaller ones. But it’s a good idea to see where the exact direction of pro bono is pointed in each firm. Domestic firms like to see locally based efforts, regional and national firms may be more inclined to want national causes.
12. If trial experience is a plus, do trials argued as pro bono work qualify?

No.
13. If experience matters, where is the best place to put that information, cover letter or resume?

Generally I wouldn’t wipe my ass with a cover letter and neither would most of my clients. The occasional client actually wants one, but I advise that you leave that to your recruiter. If you submit a resume on your own, keep the cover letter short and sweet. Put the substance on your resume. If you submit by e-mail, that counts as your cover letter, don’t add more crap for someone to read and sort through.
14. Is there an appropriate amount of time for a person to stay at their first firm job before the associate attempts to move to a larger firm (1 yr- 2 yr mark or is it measured by experience in depositions, etc)?

Three years. Really. Job hopping is very bad in this business for an Associate. So what am I going to say next? Right. Suck it up.
[Our thanks to Mr. Ross for donating his time and wisdom to the readers of the blog]

[look for pt 3 of the interview next week]

Sunday, May 11, 2008

Weekend Roundup

Apparently, having child porn will get your brothel license suspended. (Nevada Appeal)

Who knew? Apparently being in Clark Co. jail is not a happy experience. (Review-Journal)

Two Carson City teenagers have been charged for allegedly putting up some white supremacist graffiti. (Review-Journal)

State panel is considering settling in the civil rights suit brought by a Nevada Highway Patrol officer claiming sexual harassment. (Review-Journal)

A search will soon be underway at Charlie Manson's old ranch for additional human remains. (Review-Journal)

OJ apparently confessed to killing his ex-wife while he was high (AP) [blah. you're gonna have to do better than that to grab the spotlight in Vegas, Juice. We've got Halverson. We've got Gage. We've got del Vecchio]

Friday, May 9, 2008

Poor Dr. Needles/No Privacy for Victims (I mean patients)

This week, lawyers for Endoscopy Center victims [whoops . . . I meant patients] asked Judge Earl to limit the ability for Dr. "Needles" Desai [pictured right] and Eladio Carrera to send their money overseas or otherwise hide it from plaintiffs in the medical malpractice suit. Plaintiff's lawyers don't think insurance will cover damages and asked the court for an injunction on large spending by doctors.

The Reno Gazette-Journal reports:

In issuing the rare preliminary injunction, Earl declared the case extraordinary and said he believed extraordinary measures were warranted. He instructed Desai and Carrera to get approval from the court for any financial transactions of $50,000 or more.

Earl also threatened “sterner measures” if Desai and Carrera move assets using multiple transactions under $50,000. He set an Aug. 26 court date to consider extending the order. . . .

Desai’s lawyer, Dominique Pollara [of Scheuring Zimmerman Scully Tweedy & Doyle] called the concerns “absolutely baseless.” She said the preliminary injunction issued Tuesday infringed on the physicians’ due process rights to use their money.

Desai and Carrera are the majority owners of the clinic, which was closed after county health officials found several patients contracted hepatitis C through what authorities said were unsafe injection practices.
[Uh . . . "absolutely baseless," Ms. Pollara? Wasn't it just last week that Dr. Needles tried to ship his Mercedes Benzes to India? I know, I know, Ms. Pollara is just defending her villain of a client from media attacks and jury pollution, but "baseless" is a little over the top.]

Meanwhile, the Las Vegas Sun reports:

Lawyers for the Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada and its chief operator, Dr. Dipak Desai, came to court armed with a 27-page questionnaire that they wanted all of the infected plaintiffs to fill out before proceeding further with their legal claims.

The questionnaire touched on a variety of personal subjects, including the medical history of the plaintiffs, whether they have ever injected heroin, cocaine or methamphetamine and how many sexual partners and what kind of sex they have had throughout their lives.
Awesome. Sorry we gave you Hep-C, now tell us everything about your sex life and forfeit your privacy. Litigation is a wonderful process.

Ugh . . . Judge Halverson a National Story (again)

CNN is apparently having a slow news day or they are just really really late in discovering the joke that is Judge Halverson. Halverson's attorney, John Arrascada of Arrascada & Arrascada, did his best tap dancing routine for the media, actually claiming the only reason people are trying to take down Judge Halverson is that she's a whale.

CNN reports:

"We believe the Judicial Discipline Commission has overreached," said her attorney, John Arrascada. "It's apparent that some people believe her physical appearance somehow makes her unable to perform her duties as a judge." He added, "Last time I checked, being a judge doesn't require a beauty contest."
CNN even got UNLV law professor Jeffrey Stempel to hand out a quote in defense of Halverson. Stempel said he is troubled by what appears to be an attempt to "micromanage" a judge and that judicial removal should generally be reserved for corruption, "complete incompetence or inability to do the job."

Personally, I find Judge Halverson's appearance to be ridiculous and an embarrassment to the legal profession [and therefore comedy gold]. But I'm just a superficial blog writer.

Luckily the Nevada Judicial Disciplinary Commission requires a little more substance to recommend suspension. The Complaint they filed against Halverson details fourteen (14) counts of egregious, incompetent and offensive behavior, including:
C'mon, Arrascada! I know you have a job to do, but saying Judge Halverson was removed for not being pretty is like saying Judge Del Vecchio is in trouble for dating a woman.

Associate Lateral Advice (pt 1 of 3)

WWL recently interviewed a Nevada legal recruiter named Jordan Ross of Ross Legal about the process/perils of attorneys attempting a lateral move between firms.

Jordan Ross is the only Nevada member of the National Association of Legal Search Consultants. He is the principal of Ross Legal Search, LLC and previously served four years as a Vice-President with John Kurosky & Associates, a legal search firm in Irvine CA.

We put a call out to the readers for questions and apparently numerous attorneys are itchy to move to another firm because we received numerous questions to put to Mr. Ross. So, here, for your reading pleasure, is part 1 of 3 of our interview with Jordan Ross:

1. What does a firm look at when evaluating a lateral applicant’s work experience?

Before they look at experience they will look at two things that hang around your neck for years: your school rank and your class rank. Fair or not, that’s a fact of life, so get over it. They’re not so much an issue in Las Vegas as the BigCities (New York, LA, Chicago, etc.) but as more domestic firms are acquired by regional and national firms, it’s becoming more important. Relevancy and focus of practice area is next. If you’re trying to get a job doing something you haven’t before or you’ve been a generalist, you’re in trouble. This is why you have to be focused on a practice area. Then they want to see writing samples for litigators and transaction lists for transactionals.
2. Is the size of the applicant’s previous firm taken into account when deciding whether or not to grant an interview?

Yes, but not always. Far more important is what I politely call the three sectors of private practice; General Commercial, High Volume Commercial and Consumer. It’s very hard to move from one to another. It’s all about billing rates; that’s how they really judge a law firm. General Commercial firms are distinguished by doing high billing rate work for commercial clients and the wealthy. High Volume Commercial firms are doing various forms of liability defense, mostly for insurance companies on behalf of commercial clients at heavily discounted rates. Consumer firms do work for the average (i.e., not wealthy) individual clients; mostly plaintiff litigation, probate work, family law and criminal law. General Commercial firms usually are not going to be interested in your experience if it’s High Volume or Consumer. They just won’t.
Don’t try. Suck it up.
3. How much weight does experience with depositions, mediations, arbitrations and trials play into the consideration to grant an interview?

Plenty, especially jury trial experience. But never think for an instant that it’s a substitute for high quality writing skills. Real life law is not like television; if you can’t write a decent motion or brief, you won’t work at a top firm.
4. Is there an average amount of experience that an applicant should have before applying to large/regional/national law firms (in terms of years as an attorney and/or work performed—depositions, hearings, trials)?

Ideally you should have summered during law school and gone to work right out of law school. Before you move to any law firm of any size, you should be three years into your first job and at least two years into your current job. Unless there was a situation such as a layoff, you really want to keep the number of jobs before partnership to two; no more than three. Suck it up.
5. Do firms like it when applicants are assertive and call to follow-up on resume submissions or an applicant’s status post-interview?

In theory, yes, but keep it down to one telephone call and an e-mail or two. If you have a recruiter, leave it to him, until you get to the final stages of a placement.
6. Should an applicant target firms with which she has had a good previous experience?

At the risk of sounding biased, which I am, don't use references or other
acquaintances to obtain an initial interview. It places a double obligation on
them. Use your recruiter to make the presentation and secure the first meeting.
Let your friends be a reference, not a door opener. That being said, any firm
you’ve had good contact or experience with is good place to start with.
7. What are the essentials an applicant needs to know to make himself more marketable to larger firms?

Class rank, school rank, writing skills, billing volume, happy clients, selling.
Decent upscale social skills don’t hurt. The rest is fluff. There are no swell
groovy hippie marketing books or seminars with magic bullets. You have to
produce or perish.

[Our thanks to Mr. Ross for donating his time and wisdom to the readers of the blog]

[look for pt 2 and 3 of the interview next week]

Thursday, May 8, 2008

Friday Roundup

77 NEW cases of Hep-C identified. (NY Times) Meanwhile, Plaintiff's attorneys suggest that the new 77 are just the tip of the iceberg (Review-Journal)
Judge Maddox ordered a change of venue to Reno in the Governor's divorce case (Review-Journal)

The son and wife of former Clark Co. Commissioner Gates pled guilty to charges of child neglect (Review-Journal)

Thurs Afternoon Roundup

[Welcome to the new layout]
Remember when Governor Gibbons said the Endoscopy mess was really just a result of the media? Well, the media has done it again--gone and found out that 77 cases of Hep-C came from Dr. "Needles" clinic. (Review-Journal) Meanwhile, Judge Earl has limited Dr. "Needles" ability to spend more than $50,000 of his money since all those plaintiffs will soon be rolling in it. (lvcourtsblog)

After 27 years on death row, convicted murder Robert Ybarra has decided he's retarded (Ely Times)

Judge Papez wants court documents better protected (Ely Times)

And the Nevada Supremes handed down their sexiest decision (at least in name): Las Vegas Fetish and Fantasy v. Ahern Rental (Harmful Error)