Monday, July 20, 2009

The Case of the Missing Professor

Update: the missing professor, who has been identified as Professor Henderson, has emailed to congratulate the students who made it onto law review. We have a request out to the Dean asking for comment on whether the changing of grades to Pass/Fail has disadvantaged the 1L students chances to get onto law review.

Sally Student is a "rising 2L" at Boyd School of Law, a state-run facility located in the state of Nevada. Sally studied for 10 hours a day, 7 days a week during her 1L year, and put up with a variety of pointless hypotheticals posed to her by various professors.

Sally had good grades and was hopeful that she would obtain a position on Boyd's "law review" so that she could obtain her dream job - corporate document review monkey at a large insurance defense firm.

Sally did well her first semester, and felt good about her second semester exams as well. During the summer, four out of Sally's five classes reported her grades, but more than a month after grades were due her Constitutional Law grade had not yet been posted. Sally heard rumors that her Constitutional Law professor, Annie Absentee, had "disappeared." Sally's fears were confirmed when she was sent the following email from the Dean:
From: John.White@unlv.edu
Date: July 9, 2009 11:28:54 AM PDT
Subject: Constitutional Law I grades

Dear Rising 2L's,

It is possible you have heard a rumor that some first year grades are not yet available and that those classes missing the grades may be graded on a pass/fail basis. I write to confirm the basics of this rumor and clarify what has occurred.

The BSL Registrar has received all grades except grades in two sections of Constitutional Law I. Despite efforts, we have been unable to determine the status of the grades for those two sections. We understand that this is a serious inconvenience to you and potentially disruptive to your plans. Consequently, we have taken the interim step of asking another Constitutional Law Professor to grade the papers on a pass/fail basis so that we may create rankings. We expect to have those grades by early next week at the latest.

It is our hope that the professor who has not turned in grades has in fact graded them or is nearing completion of grading them. However, we have no way to know at this time what the status of those grades is. Should we receive grades by Monday (when we expect to receive the pass/fail grades) we will use them. If we do not receive them by Monday, we will utilize the pass/fail grades, calculate rankings, and move forward.

Please accept my sincere apology for this most unfortunate situation. Please trust that we are taking all appropriate steps to see that grades for the missing classes are submitted in short order. I believe that grading exams in a timely fashion is among the faculty's most significant obligations; consequently, I am extremely troubled by this situation and am taking every step possible to remedy it and will be taking additional steps to ensure something like this does not happen in the future.

Regretfully,

Dean White

Sally reasonably expected to receive an "A" in Con Law. Now that she will be graded on a pass/fail basis, however, her class ranking, journal status, scholarship and job prospects are all likely to be affected. Sally has come to you seeking advice as to her rights and the possibility of filing suit against Boyd for losing her law professor.

Prepare a short comment discussing any and all possible legal implications for Sally, Boyd, Annie, White or any other prospective parties you can think of.

(Thanks Tipster!)

68 comments:

  1. Con law was gonna be my lunch ticket. Even though I'm not very smart, I commented all the time and shared my opinions with the class constantly. I deserve an A, not a P! I am outraged.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It makes no difference--how would it anyways? What, your grades suck in everything else, but that Con Law grade is going to make you jump to the head of the class?! Please. Con Law is one of those really interesting law school classes that is practically useless in nearly all real world private practice jobs.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You poor fool. You haven't realized yet that class participation credit is a myth? The top students in this years graduating class barely opened their mouths. Class participation means nothing. Especially in this con law professor's class.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Who is the professor, Henderson?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I smell the potential for a class-action suit... Just brainstorming here, but I see the following claims being potentially viable:

    1. Breach of Contract: Arguably, each student entered into a contact with UNLV, wherein the school agreed (among other things) to provide actual letter grades for first year classes, provide a fair and just ranking system for each student, etc., in return for each student paying tuition.

    2. Breach of The Implied Covenant Of Good Faith And Fair Dealing: See above. UNLV is not dealing with the students in good faith. Arguably, the requisite special relationship exists between the school and each student - so this claim could be based both in contract and tort (punitives would then be available).

    3. Unjust Enrichment: UNLV has been benefited by each student's tuition, and it would be unjust for UNLV to retain that tuition in light of its failure to provide the class grades as promised.

    4. Negligent Infliction Of Emotional Distress: More of a stretch I know, but law school is crazy stressful for each student - and by pulling the rug out from under the feet of a student by changing the grade structure last second, this cause of action may fly

    5. Negligence/Negligent Hiring/Negligent Training/Negligent Supervision: There has to be some sort of discernible duty on UNLV's part when it come's to hiring professors. If there was any cause to believe or even suspect that this Con Law Prof. was going to flake out and disappear, you may have a negligence claim.

    6. Negligence Per Se (?): No clue about this one, but I can see how there could be a statute, rule, etc. that applies.

    What I want to know is how a story like this - that could easily make national news (it's not every day that a law school professor just says "screw this" and walks away before grading exams) - will affect UNLV's law school ranking? Will the ABA get involved (as it should)?

    I have a feeling this story is going to get much bigger - and fast. So which of Las Vegas' finest attorneys is taking this case on contingency??

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think I'm a little dumber after reading this post and its comments.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Dear Anonymous (the one with the long post on causes of action),

    I want the 3 minutes of my life back that I wasted reading your post.

    ReplyDelete
  8. @ 9:30
    It took you three minutes to read that post? Which word(s) did you have to sound out?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hey, Boyd has a lot of professors, visiting professors, lecturers, adjuncts, and the like. They were bound to lose one somewhere along the line. I'll bet he or she is on a beach somewhere. Also, why would any reasonably intelligent professor give anything other than a multiple choice exam? Make up questions. Give exam. Feed through scantron machine. Go on vacation. Laugh at other professors laboring over a stack of bluebooks.

    ReplyDelete
  10. You all need to get over yourselves. It's one grade in one class, and it is not going to determine your success or failure as an attorney. For ever person pissed off about that "A" they think they were going to get, there are probably 3 or 4 others breathing a huge sigh of relief that they didn't get that C- (or worse) they thought they were going to get. In addition, $4!* happens! Life happens! Maybe this prof got deathly ill, who knows?!?!

    Move on with your lives!!!

    ReplyDelete
  11. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I would have loved to see a P as my Con Law grade, instead of that awful letter that looks something like a "C" . . .

    But hey, things turned out fine, and I didn't even have to work at ATMNS.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Seriously? How much was this professor getting paid? Do your damn job. I would be appalled if I had a professor like that in law school.

    And how much tuition was paid? I would be upset as well.

    This is the caliber of professors they have at Boyd?

    Sad.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I too would have loved a P in Con Law... worst grade I got all law school, and have never really used anything I learned.

    ReplyDelete
  15. 8:21 AM here,

    Are you guys seriously saying that you don't think commenting in class should help your grade? We are training to be lawyers - oral advocates! I for one am sick and tired of my classmates not daring to open their mouths all the while constantly berating me behind my back. I think law school grades should be based fifty percent, if not more, on participation.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I hated oral participation. I was never scared to open my mouth, but I was too busy napping in the back row.
    When I was awake and cruising facebook, I was annoyed at people who participated because most of them didn't really get the point, and pulled the conversation in odd directions, and it wasted everyone's time.
    When I did want to participate, I took a clinic and an oral advocacy class (I'm not a Boyd Graduate). I did participate, I truly enjoyed them, and I did well. Most important point: those two classed helped me more than all of my 1L class combined, especially that useless Con Law class.

    So no, I don't think participation is necessary in every class. And I turned out just fine.

    -10:20 AM

    ReplyDelete
  17. @ 12:03

    http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=law+school+gunner

    Some of us are just trying to get by. See also:

    http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-transaction-attorney.htm

    ReplyDelete
  18. It was Henderson. The problem isn't what grade someone got it's the fact these students will have to explain away why they took Con Law I P/F. Typical Administration response pass the buck to the students.

    ReplyDelete
  19. That's what she said!

    ReplyDelete
  20. Actually, if the pass/fail ever comes up in an interview, its a great way for a law student to explain how they dealt with adversity and a ruling that didn't go their way...which often happens in court too.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I'm sad about the events that led up to the need for Dean White to take the action that he had to take, but I'm far more saddened by the tenor of some of the comments that I'm reading here, for a number of reasons.

    First, I'm not a fan of anonymous comments, because they enable people to say fairly nasty things (not just here but in all sorts of forums) without fear of retribution. If you have an opinion, please have the guts to associate your name with it.

    Second, I think that it's perfectly OK to express legitimate frustration at not getting grades, but I'm sure that the background of this particular problem is far more complex than anyone (including me) knows. Good lawyers try not to lob allegations without investigating them first.

    Finally, I wish that Blogger had ways of helping commenters proofread their comments before publishing them. I wish that law students (and I'm guessing that the bulk of the commenters are law students) could write superbly all the time, and I'm always sad when they don't.

    I will say that some of the responses here showed good flashes of humor; nonetheless, I'm sorry that our 1Ls didn't get their Con Law grades on time, and I'm sorry for any circumstances that caused the grade delay. Under the circumstances, though, I don't think that Dean White had any other choice but to come up with another way of grading those exams.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Your blog has now hit the bigtime:

    http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/07/17/law-students-lost-in-vegas/

    ReplyDelete
  23. Rapoport...What a buzzkill.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Can you get your money back as you did not take this Con Law class pass/fail? I think Boyd should give the students affected their money back or let them take a 2 L class for free

    ReplyDelete
  25. the person who detailed all those causes of action is clearly a 1L. i hope you passed contracts.

    ReplyDelete
  26. @ 5:39

    I've seen weaker claims for relief make it to trial in the District Court... more so with some Judges then others.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I am absolutely horrified and disappointed in my fellow 2Ls' lack of mercy for an obviously ill professor. Let us not forget that she is a person with health issues. Although most of you have forgotten because of your obsession with success, there is a world outside of law school, and there are much more profound things to worry about than your grade. Bunch of jackals!

    ReplyDelete
  28. How the hell is Boyd still tier 2?

    That school is a JOKE!!

    ReplyDelete
  29. @ 7:56

    Begs the question: If a student was "obviously ill," would BSL let them skip taking the final exam? And there's a big distinction between a professor who takes ill and one who takes ill and takes off.

    My firm would be sympathetic if I was ill and couldn't work... it would be much less sympathetic if I simply disappeared - sick or not.

    There is a world outside of law school, but even that world doesn't tolerate someone just dropping their responsibilities and walking away.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Wow, it's so easy to comment and cast allegations when we have very few facts, isn't it?? What if she was in a car accident? A coma? Would that make a difference? Although unlikely, none of us know all the facts. Do you, who are making so many assumptions, all get paid at law firms for jumping to conclusions in your cases? That seems dangerous. But hey, if it is somebody else, then why not assume and drag their name through the mud, right?

    ReplyDelete
  31. I agree, Dean White was put in a tough position here, and it seems he dealt with it as best he could.

    ReplyDelete
  32. @8:18

    The school is a joke because one unfortunate incident with a teacher and grading? Please, tell us why the school is a joke. Apparently US New disagrees with you, by putting it in the second tier. I'm not arguing that Boyd is HYS, but I can certainly think of worse. Especially considering the school is still in its infancy.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Good to see Rapoport chime in. Is there any way we can convince her to take over as Dean of UNLV now that Ashley is out?! She'd be a huge hit with students, faculty, and most importantly, donors. PLEASE CONSIDER!

    ReplyDelete
  34. Boyd is a great school with great professors! I am ashamed at the lack of sympathy for an ill professor displayed by our 1L class.

    You don't get As for participation alone! I have never heard of con law being someone's 'lunch ticket.' No one class can put you on law review etc. Particularly if you aren't "very smart." Con law is usually everyone's worst grade! It was mine and I have nearly straight As! Thank your lucky stars it was pass/fail!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  35. a good lesson ....... grades and law school are irrelevant ....... there are too many lawyers ........ to succeed lawyers need not know the law ...... only the judge ........ JAY BYBEE , STANLEY MARCUS , BARRY SELTZER and KEN MARRA encourage lawyers to be active in the local BAR and schmooze ......... The GOP family values crowd produced ROY COHN , SID KORSHAK , Lew Wasserman , TOM SPARGO , Mike Conahan , QUISLING MOMBACH and jonathan pollard horky .

    ReplyDelete
  36. 9:39 - What the hell does this have do with anything....I love when people use any excuse to get up on a soap box and spew out everything on their mind because they think they have a captive audience. As demonstrated, the post is usually of such "high" quality.

    Henderson is/was a good Professor...lets give her the benefit of the doubt at this moment.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Henderson does this all the time! She taught Crim Law in the Fall 2008 and didn't turn those grades in until late February! I complained to one of the deans about this and was told that Henderson is almost always late but this time was worse than any other. She really should be fired.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I think I know where the professor is. She probably just got a little stressed and went somewhere quiet to re-read the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy.

    Why do I think this? Well, she wrote a rather comforting email to Boyd students back in April, offering ways to relieve stress during finals. My favorite: when she was in law school, she studied her thick law books during the day, and "rewarded" herself by picking up even thicker Tolkein books at night, so she could follow Frodo and Sam in their heroic efforts to save Middle Earth. "Nothing could be worse than heading into Mordor!" she wrote...and boy, was she right.

    Once the ring is destroyed and Aragon is crowned king, the Hobbits will get their Con Law grade.

    P.S. I wish I had the guts to turn this in with my name, but so many professors (including Ms. Rapoport) got me in the habit of turning things in anonymously.

    ReplyDelete
  39. @9:30

    See all the previous posts about the school. Don't be an idiot and act as though this post is the issue underlying my suggestion that Boyd sucks ass.

    I'm not going to waste my time explaining why Boyd sucks other than referring you to the previous posts. Why would half the professors be leaving if it didn't suck? If you had the opportunity to attend a legitimate tier 1 or 2 school you would understand why Boyd should really be tier 4. The only reason it's tier 2 is because of the brand new facility. The faculty sucks and there's more drama there than the entire tier 3 combined...

    ReplyDelete
  40. 8:58

    Bwahahah. The reason people are leaving is because the state/university is in shambles, not the school itself. You're seriously trying to convince people that the only reason it is a tier 2 is because of the new facility?? That is laughable. Again, apparently US News disagrees with you, but I digress. I'm not the biggest US News fan, but I will give them the benefit of the doubt over some douchebag (i.e. you) who never attended the school, who professes to know everything about it. I am assuming that you did not attend Boyd. Either way, you have no way to compare unless you transferred to/from Boyd. In other words, you offer completely useless opinions.

    Also, you are making the incorrect assumption that I attended UNLV (FYI, I attended a T14). However, I have been involved with Boyd/its faculty on several occasions. I do not profess that it is the best school in the nation. However, as I said before, there are much, much worse. If you think Boyd is the only law school with drama, I have my doubts you even attended law school. All have their problems, and Boyd is no exception. However, people still should take in to account that it is a young school, and it is normal for it to be having some growing pains.

    By the way, you seem very angry. Did a Boyd student just steal your job?

    ReplyDelete
  41. My thoughts on the anonymous postings, continued: http://nancyrapoport.blogspot.com/2009/07/anonymous-postings-are-last-vestiges-of.html.

    ReplyDelete
  42. You're right Professor Rapoport, we do not know the full story. This is because administration has told us nothing other than the cryptic email message it sent out a few weeks ago. Perhaps an explanation from the administration (even if phrased in only general terms) would have softened the blow of its eventual decision.

    What we DO know is that this is not the first time this Professor has been late with grades (those of us who had her for Crim had to wait until late February to get our fall grades). Regardless of the circumstances behind her inability to meet the grade deadline, the fact that it has happened time and time again (upperclassmen and alums have told us similar stories of her being late with grades) suggests that perhaps administration should not be putting her in positions where she's required to grade exams.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Well, Nancy, believe it or not, there are people who are not media whores. Some of us just don't care to have our names out there.

    Also, the path of least resistance in a bureaucracy like your law school administration is not to throw yourself up as a martyr to be mocked by those with differing opinions. This blog provides a place for those who disagree to speak up without all the ensuing drama.

    Perhaps, instead of dismissing anonymous commenters as "cowards," you should view them as unrestrained truth-tellers who are stating their actual opinions.

    Then again, what good would that do? Hell, who cares what someone has to say if they aren't willing to post their name, right?

    -Anonymous

    ReplyDelete
  44. Update on Henderson: She's obviously at least checking her email. When Boyd announced the new members of law review and moot court, she had time to throw out an "atta-boy" in reply. No mention of her present or past whereabouts.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Boyd Students are IDIOTS!
    The fact is this original blog and subsequent comments will potentially do far greater harm to your school and degree than a pass/fail ever could.

    ReplyDelete
  46. The single best comment in nearly 50 posts: a response to Rapoport by July 18, 2009 6:47 PM which states,

    "P.S. I wish I had the guts to turn this in with my name, but so many professors (including Ms. Rapoport) got me in the habit of turning things in anonymously.".

    @ July 18, 2009 6:47 PM

    Very keen observation, whether intended or not. It is likely that all of our first anonymous submissions, that meant anything at all, were done in law school, where they taught us plainly that the professors cannot be impartial, so we take tests via #, not name.

    The recent U.S. Supreme Court Opinion about the West Virginia judge even recognizes that, "under a realistic appraisal of psychological tendencies and human weakness,' when there is a risk of actual bias posed by circumstance, due process dictates recusal by judges. Citing Withrow v. Larkin, 421 U.S. 35, 47. The students can't recuse the professors after they have made these statements, so they follow law school protocol and they are anonymous.

    Rapoport claims that since most of you are law students, you should use your real name & not fear your professors. However, she then claims,

    "As for students fearing my colleagues at Boyd, I'm really surprised--I don't see most of my colleagues as being that small-minded as to mind criticism and to penalize students for it (as long as the criticism was done in a professional--not childish--manner). They are all great people and would never be biased, "unless you deserved it"...Only when I believed that a student behaved irresponsibly did I hold it against that student."

    See https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=36806700&postID=5013169128264225420

    So, sure we could all do without the one line insults...not funny. However, I'll take that over professor, judge, etc... retribution. There is too much at stake. Nancy, certainly you get that tenure provides you increased free speech.

    This has been a hot topic for a little while now on law blags.
    See http://www.legallyunbound.com
    http://www.popehat.com
    Search anonymous or anonymity

    ReplyDelete
  47. As one of the students affected by this situation, I have spent some time thinking about it and discussing it with classmates. I think we are all very curious about what happened to the professor and why she was unable to complete the grading in a reasonable time frame. We would appreciate some more information, but really that's just to satisfy curiousity at this point. (I don't see how it would change anything, really.) Could someone from the school please give us an official answer?

    Given the above, while we were all disappointed with what happened, I feel like the "resolution" was the best possible one for the Administration. What other options were there? Have another professor grade our tests, when most of us wrote our answers with this particular professor's point of view in mind? That would have caused far more problems than the pass/fail result.

    When someone like "Sally Student" claims to have a reasonable expectation of an A in this class, I have to laugh. I had the same professor in Fall 08 for Crim Law and I can honestly say that hers was the one class where I had absolutely no idea how I did until I got my grade.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Hendu actually does bump grades up for class participation. She told me personally that she bumped me up from a B+ to an A- in her 1L torts class a few years a ago.

    ReplyDelete
  49. This posting, and the subsequent WSJ attention, had caught the attention of Above The Law, my favorite blog.
    http://abovethelaw.com/2009/07/unlv_con_law_professor_is_runn.php

    The responses seem similar to those on this comment thread.

    ReplyDelete
  50. If Rapoport thought the WWL comments were bad, wait until she reads what's being said on AboveTheLaw.com!

    ReplyDelete
  51. Some of the ATL comments shed quite a bit of light on what the rest of the nation thinks of UNLV as a law school. Maybe that'll put an end to the ever on-going discussion of whether Boyd should be taken seriously as a law school.

    On second thought . . . Maybe it won't.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Re: 3:38 PM

    Don't think that the ATL comments reflect anyone's view on Boyd. If you look at comments on other posts, they refer to schools like Duke as "TTT" -- a term I had to look up. No, these guys are the elitist douchebaggy "Top 10" types, or maybe just jerks who wish they were Top 10.

    ReplyDelete
  53. The ATL comments must reflect SOMEONE's views, no? Or are you saying a ghost posted those comments?

    Let's face it, UNLV is not worth anything to anyone outside Nevada. Yeah yeah, it's ranked 75, big deal. If you care that much about the ranking, why shouldn't people from Top 10 feel vastly superior?

    ReplyDelete
  54. Law students are quite possibly the most miserable bunch of sniveling little girls on the planet. I hope every one of Henderson's students who made a stink about this issue fails the bar seven times in a row and winds up living in a van down by Lake Mead with a rough trick. Boo hoo. Write on to law review if you're that worried.

    Tobias NEVER got his grades in on time back in the day. Dean Morgan never sent around emails to placate the whiners. Shame on Dean White for kowtowing to this bunch of miserable 1L snotnoses.

    ReplyDelete
  55. I agree with 4:50. A few people ridiculing a second tier school is no surprise, and I actually thought it would be much worse. Boyd isn't really any better or worse than its second tier piers, but it is certainly no T14. You're foolish if you expect it to be treated as such. I don't think anybody (with a brain) expects people to treat Boyd as HYS, but it is a decent regional school.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Golly, what's with the super hostility against Boyd? Should Boyd graduates walk around with a scarlet "B" on their suits so everyone knows that they are beneath the lawyers from real law schools?

    ReplyDelete
  57. @10:25 and 5:06:

    Well statistically it doesn't appear to be too terrible a school. I know that my graduating class alone consisted of a biglaw associate, a ninth circuit clerk, a securities and exchange commission attorney, and a legal counsel for Harry Reid. That list does not include the several graduates who went to work for larger regional-type firms. And this is only one year. I think that is a pretty good list, comparable to, and perhaps better than, many second tier schools, and rivaling some first tier.

    My point is not that Boyd is the best school on the face of the earth-it's not. However, it is a decent school that is still young and has some potential. Besides, in the law school universe, anything outside the top 14 to 20 can pretty much be grouped into the "everything else" category (or "tier," if you would prefer that term). I do, however, agree with the previous poster that it is interesting why so many people feel the need to bash on Boyd students. Why is this? These people apparently went somewhere else, so what do they know about the quality of the program? Why are you so bitter, and why do you think so much about, UNLV graduates? Inquiring minds would like to know.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Why do people bash on Boyd? Because there is a major inferiority complex in the legal world. People feel better about themselves and keep having to find ways to prove how great they are. Inevitably it leads to childish bashing on someone or institution who they deem less worthy. You see it all the time, in order to make yourself feel better about the firm you work at, you bash a firm you deem to be of lesser stature. The ATL posts are nothing but garbage and can't be taken serious.

    ReplyDelete
  59. I agree. But I have to say that I expected the ATL posts to be much, much worse than they are.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Who cares? so what you had to take a "pass" it does NOT affect your GPA, and it does not affect your chances to get on law review (despite what sally the student may think). I've NEVER met a single classman that walked out of con law knowing they aced it. In fact that is true for most law school exams (at least if they are curved). If you think you did well, so did half the class b/c it was probably too easy.

    Now I understand why people may be upset b/c Henderson has been late previously. However, no one knows the full extent of those stories either.

    To the complaining 1Ls, look to your left, now look to your right,only one of you would have had your GPA actually increase, and chances are its the one that is NOT complaining

    ReplyDelete
  61. I never leave comments on any blog or website, but I really wanted to join the discussion about Boyd and its wonderful students.

    I had the good fortune of attending a top 5 law school. I had that opportunity because law schools have decided to heavily weigh one thing I am good at: multiple choice tests. I have been practicing here in Las Vegas for a few years, and I must say I have been blown away by the quality of the Boyd grads.

    At my school, my fellow students liked to perpetuate the idea that anyone who attended a school lower than the top 14 probably spent their days drooling on themselves. My classmates could not have been more wrong. I have been mentored, tutored, beaten, and humbled by Boyd grads in the past, and I imagine that will continue in the future.

    As a life-long Nevadan, I must admit that there is little that we can celebrate when it comes to education; however, Boyd has been a magnificient success.

    Cheers to all of the past and present Boyd grads. Whenever (if I ever) get the chance to make hiring decisions, I will not hesitate to look in my own backyard.

    ReplyDelete
  62. http://www.ratemyprofessors.com/ShowRatings.jsp?tid=899912

    ReplyDelete
  63. @Anon July 21, 2009 9:07 AM

    A website to which only snivelers seem to post harshes on Henderson as "not awesome." Are you trying to make a point?

    ReplyDelete
  64. Henderson was actually one of the best professors I had. 1Ls need to get over themselves. The world does not evolve around them. Professor Henderson had health issues....shit happens....get over it

    ReplyDelete
  65. for an update, ATL has reported that Professor Henderson has confirmed that she had health issues and she took the appropriate steps to inform the administration. People get sick, it happens.

    ReplyDelete
  66. Current Hendy student praying that we get the same ease of pass or fail determination for a final grade.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Con Law is one of those really interesting law school classes that is practically useless in nearly all real world private practice jobs.

    ReplyDelete